Legal Case Summary

Rodney Cable v. City of Phoenix


Date Argued: Tue Mar 15 2016
Case Number: 14-15037
Docket Number: 3047500
Judges:Fernandez, Gould, Friedland
Duration: 28 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Rodney Cable v. City of Phoenix** **Docket Number**: 3047500 **Court**: [Specify relevant court, e.g., Superior Court of Arizona] **Date**: [Specify date of decision if available] **Parties**: - **Plaintiff**: Rodney Cable - **Defendant**: City of Phoenix **Background**: Rodney Cable filed a lawsuit against the City of Phoenix alleging [specific claims, e.g., wrongful termination, discrimination, violation of civil rights]. The case arose from events that took place on [specific dates or time frame], when [provide a brief overview of the incident or issue leading to the lawsuit]. **Facts**: - Rodney Cable was employed by the City of Phoenix in [specific position or role]. - [Describe relevant facts about Cable's employment, including any incidents, performance evaluations, or behavior leading to the litigation]. - Cable contends that the City of Phoenix engaged in [specific wrongful actions, such as discriminatory practices, failure to adhere to policies, etc.], which led to [describe the direct consequences, e.g., termination, harm, etc.]. **Claims**: Cable's complaint includes allegations of [list the specific claims or legal grounds, such as violation of employment laws, retaliatory actions, etc.]. He seeks [list the relief sought, e.g., damages, reinstatement, policy changes]. **Legal Issues**: This case raises important legal issues regarding [summarize main legal issues at stake, e.g., interpretation of employment law, the legitimacy of the city’s actions, evidentiary standards, etc.]. **Ruling**: [Include details of the court's ruling, including whether the court found in favor of Cable or the City of Phoenix, any legal principles established or affirmed, and orders issued by the court.] **Conclusion**: The outcome of Rodney Cable v. City of Phoenix will impact not only the parties involved but also set a precedent for similar cases within the jurisdiction. The case highlights the complexities involved in employment law and the responsibilities of municipal entities toward their employees. **Notes**: [Include any additional relevant notes or comments about the case, such as notable implications, ongoing proceedings, or links to future legal actions.] --- *Please note that this summary is a hypothetical representation based on a template. Actual case details, including facts and the ruling, need to be filled in based on real case documents or legal databases.*

Rodney Cable v. City of Phoenix


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available