Case Summary
**Case Summary: Roger Gillispie v. Warden, London Correctional Institution**
**Docket Number:** 4425960
**Court:** [Specify the Court, e.g., Ohio Court of Appeals]
**Date:** [Specify the Date of the Decision]
**Overview:**
The case of Roger Gillispie v. Warden, London Correctional Institution involves an appeal filed by Roger Gillispie, who is challenging the actions or decisions made by the Warden of the London Correctional Institution. The case arises from issues related to Gillispie's incarceration conditions, rights, or procedural matters relevant to his confinement.
**Background:**
Roger Gillispie, the appellant, was incarcerated at the London Correctional Institution, where he claims to have faced certain grievances—including possible violations of his civil rights, improper treatment, or issues regarding parole or sentence calculation. The specifics of these grievances and the reasons for his appeal would need to be outlined in detail, often concerning statutory or constitutional claims.
**Legal Issues:**
The primary legal issues in this case may include:
1. Whether Gillispie's rights were violated under state or federal law during his incarceration.
2. Questions regarding the procedures followed by the correctional institution in relation to inmate treatment.
3. Procedural fairness in the denial of any requests or grievances filed by Gillispie.
4. Review of any disciplinary actions taken against him while in custody.
**Court's Findings:**
The court's findings would include an analysis of the legal arguments presented by both Gillispie and the Warden's office. The decision could range from upholding the actions of the Warden, dismissing Gillispie's claims, or identifying areas where his rights may have been infringed upon, thus potentially ordering corrective measures or further hearings.
**Conclusion:**
The outcome of Roger Gillispie v. Warden, London Correctional Institution is not specified in this summary but would typically conclude with either an affirmation of the lower court's ruling, a reversal, or a remand for further proceedings. The case's implications may also extend to future actions taken by correctional institutions concerning the treatment of inmates and adherence to legal standards.
**Note:** For a complete understanding, including specifics such as the legal arguments, citations, and rulings, one would need to refer to the full court opinion or legal briefs associated with the case.