Legal Case Summary

Rolando Hernandez v. Mark Tanninen


Date Argued: Thu Dec 10 2009
Case Number: 09-35085
Docket Number: 7848504
Judges:Benitez, Gould, Tallman
Duration: 31 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Rolando Hernandez v. Mark Tanninen** **Docket Number:** 7848504 **Court:** [Specify the court if known, e.g., Superior Court, District Court, etc.] **Date:** [Include the date of the decision or the date filed, if known.] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Rolando Hernandez - **Defendant:** Mark Tanninen **Facts of the Case:** Rolando Hernandez filed a lawsuit against Mark Tanninen concerning [briefly describe the nature of the dispute, such as a personal injury claim, breach of contract, property dispute, etc.]. The plaintiff alleges [summarize the plaintiff's claims, including relevant details such as dates, locations, and actions taken]. **Legal Issues:** The case primarily revolves around [identify the main legal issues, such as negligence, breach of fiduciary duty, contract interpretation, etc.]. Key legal questions in this case include: 1. [Question 1: e.g., Did Mark Tanninen breach a duty owed to Rolando Hernandez?] 2. [Question 2: e.g., Was there sufficient evidence to support the plaintiff's claims?] **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff's Arguments:** Rolando Hernandez’s legal team argued that [summarize the key arguments made by the plaintiff, including any evidence or legal precedents cited]. - **Defendant's Arguments:** Mark Tanninen’s defense contended that [summarize the defendant's counterarguments and defenses presented]. **Court's Ruling:** The court ruled in favor of [either Rolando Hernandez or Mark Tanninen], [briefly state the outcome, e.g., a judgment for damages, dismissal of the case, etc.]. The decision was based on [mention any critical findings or interpretations of law that influenced the ruling]. **Significance:** This case is significant because [discuss the broader implications of the ruling, potential impact on future cases, or contributions to legal principles or precedents]. **Conclusion:** The outcome of Rolando Hernandez v. Mark Tanninen reflects [summarize the essence of the case outcome and its implications]. This case serves as [indicate any lessons learned or important takeaways related to the legal issues involved]. **Note:** This summary is a fictional representation created for illustrative purposes. Please consult legal databases or resources for actual case details and rulings.

Rolando Hernandez v. Mark Tanninen


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available