Legal Case Summary

Romo v. Springs Window


Date Argued: Fri Dec 07 2007
Case Number: 06-15056
Docket Number: 7853341
Judges:Farris, Beezer, Thomas
Duration: 17 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Romo v. Springs Window, Docket No. 7853341** **Court:** [Specify the court if known, e.g., Superior Court, Appellate Court] **Date:** [Insert date of decision if known] **Parties:** - **Plaintiff:** [Insert Plaintiff's name, e.g., Romo] - **Defendant:** Springs Window [or full legal name if applicable] **Background:** The case of Romo v. Springs Window involves a dispute between the plaintiff, Romo, and the defendant, Springs Window. The specifics of the case stem from an incident that occurred on [insert the date of incident], where the plaintiff alleged that [briefly explain the nature of the claim, e.g., wrongful termination, personal injury, etc.]. **Facts:** - On [specific date], Romo, an employee of Springs Window, [summarize key facts leading up to the case: what happened, the nature of employment, any incidents or actions taken that led to the dispute]. - Following the incident, Romo [explain any significant events following the incident, such as job termination, injury claim, filing of a lawsuit, etc.]. - The defendant, Springs Window, [describe the company’s response, any defenses claimed, or counterarguments made]. **Legal Issues:** The central legal issues in this case include: 1. [State first legal issue, e.g., breach of contract, negligence, wrongful termination]. 2. [State second issue if applicable]. 3. [Additional issues, if necessary]. **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff’s Argument:** Romo argued that [summarize the plaintiff's claims and legal basis, including any relevant statutes or case law]. - **Defendant’s Argument:** Springs Window contend that [summarize the defendant's defense and legal reasoning]. **Decision:** [Summarize the ruling of the court, including the outcome – whether the court ruled in favor of the plaintiff or defendant, any damages awarded, or other remedies granted]. **Conclusion:** The court's decision in Romo v. Springs Window serves as a significant precedent for [mention any implications or significance regarding employment law, personal injury, or related matters]. **Notes:** - [Include any key quotes or notable comments made by the judge]. - [Mention any subsequent actions such as appeals or further proceedings if they exist]. *Note: This summary is a general interpretation and may not reflect the detailed nuances of the actual legal case. For comprehensive legal insights, one should consult the full court opinion and applicable legal resources.*

Romo v. Springs Window


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available