Legal Case Summary

Ronald Dingle v. Robert Stevenson


Date Argued: Tue Sep 20 2016
Case Number: 15-6832
Docket Number: 4423960
Judges:J. Harvie Wilkinson III, Diana Gribbon Motz, Pamela A. Harris
Duration: 46 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Ronald Dingle v. Robert Stevenson** **Docket Number:** 4423960 **Court:** [Specific Court Name, e.g., District Court, State Court] **Date:** [Date of Filing or Hearing] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Ronald Dingle - **Defendant:** Robert Stevenson **Case Background:** This case involves a civil dispute between Ronald Dingle and Robert Stevenson. The plaintiff, Ronald Dingle, has brought forth claims against the defendant, Robert Stevenson, alleging [specific allegations, e.g., breach of contract, negligence, personal injury]. The dispute arose on [date or period of occurrence], when [briefly describe the events leading to the litigation]. **Issues:** The primary legal issues in this case include: 1. [First Legal Issue, e.g., Did the defendant breach a contractual obligation?] 2. [Second Legal Issue, e.g., Was there negligence on the part of the defendant?] **Legal Arguments:** - The plaintiff argues that [summarize plaintiff’s arguments, e.g., the defendant failed to fulfill a contractual duty, causing financial loss]. - The defendant counters that [summarize defendant’s arguments, e.g., the plaintiff did not adhere to the agreed terms, or that the incident was an accident beyond their control]. **Court’s Analysis:** The court has assessed [mention any relevant evidence, testimonies, or legal precedents considered]. It examined the credibility of the parties' claims and the evidence presented, including [any key documents, witness statements, etc.]. **Ruling:** The court [state the court’s decision, e.g., ruled in favor of the plaintiff, dismissed the case, etc.]. The judgment included [briefly outline any ordered remedies, such as monetary compensation, injunctions, etc.]. **Conclusion:** The outcome of Ronald Dingle v. Robert Stevenson emphasizes [any broader implications or principles established by the case, such as the importance of contractual obligations or standards of care]. The case serves as a precedent for similar disputes in the jurisdiction. **Next Steps:** Following the ruling, [mention any further actions either party may take, such as filing an appeal, complying with the judgment, etc.]. --- *Note: Specific details such as dates, legal issues, and arguments should be filled in based on the actual content of the case to ensure accuracy.*

Ronald Dingle v. Robert Stevenson


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available