Legal Case Summary

Rosenau v. Unifund


Date Argued: Wed Jun 10 2009
Case Number: 146440
Docket Number: 2601099
Judges:Not available
Duration: 38 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Rosenau v. Unifund, Docket Number 2601099** **Court:** [Insert Court Name] **Date:** [Insert Date of Judgment] **Parties Involved:** - **Appellant:** Rosenau - **Appellee:** Unifund **Background:** Rosenau initiated legal action against Unifund stemming from a dispute related to [briefly describe the nature of the dispute, e.g., a debt collection, breach of contract, etc.]. The case revolves around the legality of Unifund's collection practices and whether they conform to existing consumer protection regulations. **Facts:** - Rosenau alleged that Unifund engaged in [specific actions or behaviors that led to the dispute, such as aggressive collection tactics, failure to validate debt, etc.]. - Unifund, on the other hand, defended its actions by stating that they complied with all relevant laws and procedures governing debt collection. **Legal Issues:** - The primary legal issues addressed in this case included whether Unifund violated [specific laws or regulations, such as the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) or state-specific laws] and whether Rosenau suffered damages as a result of Unifund's actions. - The court was also tasked with determining the appropriate remedies available to Rosenau should the violations be proven. **Court's Decision:** The court found in favor of [Rosenau/Unifund], concluding that [summarize the court's findings and rationale, including any key legal precedents or statutes applied]. The court noted that [any significant observations or comments regarding the conduct of either party]. **Outcome:** - The court ordered [specific relief granted, such as payment of damages, dismissal of claims, etc.], which reflects the implications of the ruling on both parties and highlights the importance of [any broader implications for consumer rights or debt collection practices]. **Conclusion:** This case underscores the complexities surrounding consumer debt collection and the protections afforded to individuals under the law. The decision serves as a significant reference for similar disputes involving debt collection agencies and highlights the importance of compliance with consumer protection regulations. **Note:** Ensure to fill in the placeholders for accurate and specific details related to the case, including the court name, date, and the nature of the dispute.

Rosenau v. Unifund


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available