Legal Case Summary

Roy Russ v. Audrey King


Date Argued: Mon Nov 17 2014
Case Number: 71464-3
Docket Number: 2603527
Judges:Lynn, Hawkins, Rawlinson
Duration: 19 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Roy Russ v. Audrey King** **Docket Number:** 2603527 **Court:** [Specify the court, if known] **Date:** [Specify the date, if known] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Roy Russ - **Defendant:** Audrey King **Overview:** In the case of Roy Russ v. Audrey King, the plaintiff, Roy Russ, brought a suit against the defendant, Audrey King, concerning [briefly specify the nature of the dispute, e.g., breach of contract, property dispute, personal injury, etc.]. **Facts of the Case:** [Briefly outline the relevant facts that led to the dispute. Include key details such as dates, events, and actions taken by both parties. For example, if this was a contractual dispute, mention when the agreement was made, the terms of the agreement, and how the defendant allegedly breached those terms.] **Legal Issues:** The main legal issues at stake in this case included: 1. [Specify first legal issue, such as whether the defendant breached a specific contractual obligation.] 2. [Specify second issue, if applicable. This could involve questions of liability, damages, etc.] 3. [List any other relevant legal principles or statutes that were discussed in the case.] **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff’s Arguments:** The plaintiff, Roy Russ, argued that [summarize the plaintiff’s position and the evidence they presented to support their claims, including any witnesses, documents, or expert testimony used to substantiate their case]. - **Defendant’s Arguments:** The defendant, Audrey King, contended that [summarize the defendant’s position, including any defenses raised, counterclaims, or evidence presented in opposition to the plaintiff’s claims]. **Court’s Ruling:** [Summarize the court's decision. Did they rule in favor of Roy Russ or Audrey King? What were the key findings that led to the ruling? Did the court provide any specific instructions or orders as part of their judgment?] **Conclusion:** The case of Roy Russ v. Audrey King highlights the complexities of [insert key themes, such as contractual obligations, personal accountability, etc.], and serves as a critical reference for similar cases in the future. The court's ruling underscores the importance of [mention any broader implications or considerations based on the ruling]. **Significance:** This case addresses important aspects such as [insert any wider implications, legal precedents, or societal factors relevant to the case]. It contributes to the body of case law concerning [specify area of law, such as civil rights, contract law, etc.]. [If applicable, include any future proceedings or appeals that may follow this decision, along with any potential implications for the parties involved.] **Note:** The details provided here are a generalized template. For accurate information, consult the actual case files or legal databases. --- Feel free to adjust or add specific details based on the actual case content if available.

Roy Russ v. Audrey King


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available