Legal Case Summary

Rozsavolgyi v. City of Aurora


Date Argued: Tue Jan 26 2016
Case Number: 2-15-0493
Docket Number: 3082674
Judges:Not available
Duration: 44 minutes
Court Name: Appellate Court of Illinois

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Rozsavolgyi v. City of Aurora, Docket No. 3082674** **Court:** [Specify Court, e.g., District Court, Court of Appeals, etc.] **Date:** [Specify Date of Decision] **Key Parties:** - **Plaintiff:** [Name] Rozsavolgyi - **Defendant:** City of Aurora **Background:** The case of Rozsavolgyi v. City of Aurora involves a dispute between the plaintiff, Rozsavolgyi, and the City of Aurora. The specifics of the case stem from [briefly outline the nature of the dispute, e.g., alleged violations of rights, property disputes, etc.]. Rozsavolgyi claimed [summarize the plaintiff’s claims, e.g., unlawful actions by the city, failure to uphold certain regulations, etc.]. **Legal Issues:** 1. [Issue 1: Brief description] 2. [Issue 2: Brief description] 3. [Additional issues, if any] **Ruling:** The court ruled in favor of [either the plaintiff or the defendant], finding that [summarize the court's reasoning]. The court concluded that [highlight key findings and conclusions drawn by the judge]. **Significance:** This case is significant because [discuss the implications of the ruling, any precedent it may set, and its impact on local governance, individual rights, or relevant law]. **Conclusion:** The case of Rozsavolgyi v. City of Aurora demonstrates important aspects of [highlight relevant legal principles, issues of public policy, etc.]. The court's decision will have lasting effects on [identify what areas may be affected going forward]. --- *Note: The details, including the parties involved, legal issues, and specific legal rulings, would need to be filled in with accurate information from the case record as the provided information is a template. Actual case specifics may differ.*

Rozsavolgyi v. City of Aurora


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available


© Legal Case Summary. Data from Free Law Project and Courtlister