Legal Case Summary

Ruben Ceron v. Eric H. Holder Jr.


Date Argued: Wed Dec 11 2013
Case Number: 08-70836
Docket Number: 7836845
Judges:Kozinski, Reinhardt, Silverman, Graber, Gould, Paez, Clifton, Bea, Smith, Murguia, Hurwitz
Duration: 63 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Ruben Ceron v. Eric H. Holder Jr.** **Docket Number:** 7836845 **Court:** [Specify Court if known] **Date:** [Include Date if known] **Overview:** Ruben Ceron brought a case against Eric H. Holder Jr., who was then the Attorney General of the United States. The case primarily involves issues related to immigration and citizenship laws in the United States. **Facts:** Ruben Ceron, the petitioner, sought relief under applicable immigration statutes. The specifics of Ceron's immigration status, any prior legal challenges, and the events leading to this case are crucial for understanding the context. Typically, these include claims such as asylum, cancellation of removal, or other forms of immigration relief. **Legal Issues:** The primary legal issues in this case likely pertain to: 1. **Eligibility for Relief:** Determining whether Ceron met the necessary qualifications for the relief he was seeking. 2. **Administrative Procedure:** Examining whether the actions taken by the Attorney General or the immigration courts complied with statutory and regulatory requirements. 3. **Due Process:** Assessing whether Ceron’s rights were upheld during any proceedings related to his immigration status. **Arguments:** 1. **For the Petitioner (Ceron):** Ceron may argue that he was wrongfully denied the immigration relief he sought. He might contend that there were errors in the application of the law, a lack of due process in the immigration proceedings, or new evidence that warranted reevaluation of his status. 2. **For the Respondent (Holder):** The government could argue that Ceron did not meet the legal criteria for the relief sought, and that all procedures followed were in accordance with the law and regulations. **Conclusion:** The outcome of the case would hinge on the interpretation of immigration law, the specific facts surrounding Ceron’s situation, and any procedural issues that may have been raised. The court's decision would potentially set a precedent for similar future cases involving immigration relief and procedural safeguards. **Implications:** Depending on the ruling, this case could impact the standards for immigration relief applications and the obligations of the Attorney General and immigration courts in handling such cases. **Note:** It is important to access case databases or court records for detailed information regarding the arguments presented, court rulings, and any opinions issued in the case of Ruben Ceron v. Eric H. Holder Jr.

Ruben Ceron v. Eric H. Holder Jr.


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available