Legal Case Summary

Russell Road Food and Beverage v. Michael Galam


Date Argued: Mon Nov 17 2014
Case Number: 71464-3
Docket Number: 2603526
Judges:Daniel, Noonan, Ikuta
Duration: 33 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Russell Road Food and Beverage v. Michael Galam** **Docket Number:** 2603526 **Court:** [Specify jurisdiction and court] **Date:** [Specify date of decision] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Russell Road Food and Beverage - **Defendant:** Michael Galam **Background:** Russell Road Food and Beverage filed a lawsuit against Michael Galam regarding a dispute that arose in the course of their business dealings. The issues at stake typically involve contractual obligations, alleged breaches, or disputes over the terms of their agreement, though specific details regarding the agreement and the claims made by the plaintiff are critical in understanding the case. **Facts:** The plaintiff, Russell Road Food and Beverage, operates a food and drink establishment, while Michael Galam is presumably involved in a capacity relevant to the dispute, possibly as a supplier, customer, or partner. The nature of the disagreement could pertain to payment issues, delivery of goods, quality of service or products, or breaches of specific contractual terms agreed upon by both parties. **Legal Issues:** The central legal issues in this case may involve: - Breach of contract: Determining whether either party failed to meet their obligations under the agreement. - Damages: Assessing the financial impact of the alleged breach on the plaintiff. - Possible defenses: Evaluating any defenses raised by the defendant, such as lack of jurisdiction, improper service, or other claims. **Court's Findings:** The court would analyze the evidence presented, including contracts, communications, and any other relevant documentation. The decision would hinge on determining whether a breach occurred and the extent to which the plaintiff is entitled to damages or specific relief. **Conclusion:** The court's ruling would ultimately clarify the rights and obligations of each party under the terms of their agreement, including any damages awarded to the plaintiff or any defenses upheld for the defendant. The implications of this case may affect future contractual relationships and expectations in the food and beverage industry. **Note:** Specific factual details, legal reasoning, and the final decision or ruling are necessary for a comprehensive summary but are not included here due to the absence of case-specific information. For a more exhaustive analysis, additional details from court documents or filings would be required.

Russell Road Food and Beverage v. Michael Galam


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available