Legal Case Summary

Rustin Smith v. City & County of Honolulu


Date Argued: Thu Feb 15 2018
Case Number: 14-17309
Docket Number: 6306229
Judges:O'scannlain, Clifton, Ikuta
Duration: 32 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Rustin Smith v. City & County of Honolulu** **Docket Number:** 6306229 **Court:** [Insert Court Name, e.g., Hawaii State Court] **Filing Date:** [Insert Date] **Overview:** Rustin Smith filed a lawsuit against the City and County of Honolulu, alleging [insert brief description of the claim, e.g., negligence, violation of rights, etc.]. The case centers around events that occurred on [insert relevant date or period], where Smith claims [insert key allegations, e.g., improper government action, failure to maintain public property, etc.]. **Facts:** - On [insert date], Rustin Smith was involved in [provide a detailed account of the events leading up to the lawsuit, including locations, actions taken by both parties, and other relevant circumstances]. - Smith alleges that [insert specific actions or inactions by the City and County of Honolulu that are alleged to have caused harm]. - The City and County of Honolulu contended that [insert any defenses or counterarguments made by the City and County]. **Legal Issues:** The primary legal issues in this case include: 1. [List the main legal issues, e.g., whether the City and County of Honolulu is liable under state tort law]. 2. [Any constitutional issues, if applicable]. 3. [Any procedural issues, such as failure to exhaust administrative remedies, etc.]. **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff’s Perspective (Rustin Smith):** - Smith argues that [summarize the plaintiff's key arguments and the relief sought, e.g., compensation for damages, injunctive relief]. - [Mention any specific laws or statutes that support Smith’s claims]. - **Defendant’s Perspective (City and County of Honolulu):** - The City and County assert that [summarize the defense's arguments, including any legal justifications or defenses invoked]. - [Include any relevant legal precedents or statutes cited by the City and County]. **Outcome:** [If available, provide the outcome of the case, such as a ruling by the court, any settlements, or trial verdicts. If the case is still pending, you may state that the case is ongoing.] **Significance:** This case is significant as it addresses [discuss the implications of the case, such as public policy issues, potential precedent it may set for future cases, and its impact on municipal liability]. **Next Steps:** [If applicable, include any upcoming hearings, deadlines, or actions that need to be taken in the case.] --- Please insert specific details where indicated for a thorough and complete case summary.

Rustin Smith v. City & County of Honolulu


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available