Legal Case Summary

Sami Mitri v. Walgreen Co.


Date Argued: Thu Oct 17 2013
Case Number: 11-17836
Docket Number: 7837147
Judges:Kendall, Thomas, McKeown
Duration: 32 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Sami Mitri v. Walgreen Co. - Docket Number 7837147** **Court:** [Specify the court, e.g., Circuit Court, etc.] **Date:** [Insert date of decision or notable filings] **Parties:** - **Plaintiff:** Sami Mitri - **Defendant:** Walgreen Co. **Background:** Sami Mitri filed a lawsuit against Walgreen Co., the well-known pharmacy chain, alleging [insert main legal claims, e.g., wrongful termination, discrimination, etc.]. The dispute arose from [briefly describe the facts leading to the case, e.g., Mitri's employment status, incidents related to the claims, etc.]. **Legal Issues:** The primary legal issues in this case include: 1. [Issue 1: e.g., Whether Walgreen Co. violated employment laws in its treatment of Mitri.] 2. [Issue 2: e.g., Whether there was sufficient evidence to support the claims of discrimination or wrongful action.] **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff's Argument:** Sami Mitri argued that [summarize the plaintiff's key arguments, including any relevant evidence, occurrences, or testimonies mentioned in the case]. - **Defendant's Argument:** Walgreen Co. contended that [summarize the defendant's key arguments, defenses raised, and any evidence they presented to counter Mitri's claims]. **Court's Findings:** The court reviewed the evidence presented by both parties, including [mention any important documents, testimonies, or material evidence]. The court found that [summarize the court's findings regarding liability, adherence to legal standards, or any procedural issues]. **Outcome:** The court ruled in favor of [either Sami Mitri or Walgreen Co.], stating that [insert the court's conclusion and any orders issued, such as compensatory damages, reinstatement, policy changes, etc.]. Any further actions or appeals were noted here if applicable. **Implications:** This case emphasizes [describe any broader implications, such as impacts on employment law, corporate policies, or similar cases]. The outcome highlights the importance of [insert key takeaways regarding workplace rights, employer responsibilities, etc.]. **Conclusion:** The ruling on this case serves as a significant reference point for future cases involving [mention specific issues such as workplace discrimination, wrongful termination, etc.], thereby reinforcing the legal protections concerning [specific area of law or rights involved]. (Note: Please fill in the specific details and outcomes as they pertain to the actual case, as this is a generic template.)

Sami Mitri v. Walgreen Co.


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available