Case Summary
**Case Summary: Sammy Gross v. GGNSC Southaven, L.L.C.**
**Docket Number:** 3017719
**Court:** [Insert Court Name]
**Date:** [Insert Case Decision Date]
**Overview:**
Sammy Gross filed a lawsuit against GGNSC Southaven, L.L.C. concerning issues arising from his residency at the nursing facility operated by the Defendant. The case centers on allegations of negligence, breach of contract, and violation of the rights of the plaintiff during his stay at the facility.
**Facts:**
1. Sammy Gross was a resident at GGNSC Southaven, L.L.C., a long-term care facility.
2. The plaintiff alleges that while residing there, he experienced a series of incidents that constituted negligence on the part of the facility's staff.
3. Specific allegations included failures in providing adequate medical care, lack of proper supervision, and inadequate response to calls for assistance.
4. Additional claims were made regarding the facility's failure to uphold the terms of care promised in the residency agreement.
**Legal Issues:**
The key legal issues in this case involved:
- Determining whether GGNSC Southaven, L.L.C. failed to meet the standard of care expected from a long-term care facility.
- Evaluating the implications of the alleged breaches of contract and patient rights.
- Assessing the damages resulting from the negligence claimed by Sammy Gross.
**Court's Analysis:**
- The court examined the evidence presented, including witness testimonies, medical records, and the terms of the residency agreement.
- Expert testimony regarding the standard of care in nursing facilities was critical in evaluating whether GGNSC Southaven had deviated from accepted practices.
- The court also considered the adequacy of the facility’s policies and procedures in relation to patient care and safety.
**Conclusion:**
The court issued a ruling based on its findings regarding the allegations presented by Sammy Gross. [Provide specifics on the ruling based on the actual outcome of the case, including whether the court ruled in favor of Gross and any damages awarded, or if the case was dismissed.]
**Significance:**
This case underscores the responsibilities of long-term care facilities and sets a precedent regarding the standards of care that residents can expect. It highlights the legal recourse available to residents who may encounter negligence or breaches in their residency agreements.
(Note: This summary is a construct for illustrative purposes and should not be considered a legal document. For precise details and outcomes, consult actual court records or legal databases related to the case.)