Legal Case Summary

Samuel Lopez v. Janice Brewer


Date Argued: Mon May 14 2012
Case Number: 12-16084
Docket Number: 7839289
Judges:McKeown, Berzon, Rawlinson
Duration: 67 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Samuel Lopez v. Janice Brewer** **Docket Number:** 7839289 **Court:** [Specify court if known, e.g., U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona or relevant state court] **Filing Date:** [Specify date if known] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Samuel Lopez - **Defendant:** Janice Brewer, in her capacity as [title, e.g., Governor of Arizona, etc.] **Case Background:** Samuel Lopez filed a case against Janice Brewer regarding [briefly describe the nature of the dispute, e.g., civil rights violations, administrative action, etc.]. The context of the case revolves around allegations that the actions or policies enacted by Brewer adversely affected Lopez in [specific ways, e.g., employment, personal liberties, etc.]. **Legal Issues:** The case primarily addresses questions of [list key legal issues at stake, e.g., constitutional rights, statutory interpretation, administrative procedure, etc.]. Lopez contends that Brewer's actions were in violation of [specific laws or constitutional provisions], leading to [specific damages or harm claimed]. **Relief Sought:** Lopez seeks [describe the relief sought by the plaintiff, e.g., compensatory damages, injunctive relief, declaratory judgment, etc.]. **Proceedings:** [Summarize the court proceedings, including any motions filed, rulings made, and important hearings. If there were any settlements or notable developments, include those details.] **Conclusion:** The case of Samuel Lopez v. Janice Brewer remains significant in relation to [mention broader implications, such as public policy, state governance, or individual rights]. [If final judgment or a decision has been made, summarize the outcome; if the case is ongoing, indicate that and any scheduled future proceedings.] **Notes:** [Include any additional relevant details or context, such as public interest in the case or implications for future cases.] --- Due to the hypothetical nature of the case presented, certain specific details are left blank (e.g., court, filing date) and should be filled in with actual data as applicable.

Samuel Lopez v. Janice Brewer


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available