Legal Case Summary

San Jacinto v. Nat'l Union


Date Argued: Tue Dec 02 2003
Case Number: 02-56710
Docket Number: 7860676
Judges:B. Fletcher, Farris, Wardlaw
Duration: 30 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: San Jacinto v. National Union (Docket Number: 7860676)** **Court**: [Specify Court Name, if available] **Date**: [Specify Date of Ruling or Filing] **Overview**: The case of San Jacinto v. National Union revolves around a dispute regarding insurance coverage and the obligations of the insurer, National Union, in relation to a claim made by San Jacinto. **Facts**: San Jacinto, a [brief description of the entity, e.g., corporation, municipality], held an insurance policy with National Union, which provided coverage for [specific risks or claims, e.g., liability, property damage]. Following an incident involving [describe the incident briefly, e.g., an accident, property damage, litigation], San Jacinto sought compensation under the terms of the insurance policy. National Union, however, denied the claim, citing [specific reasons for denial, such as policy exclusions, lack of coverage, etc.]. **Issues**: The primary legal issue in this case centers around whether National Union's denial of the claim was justified under the terms of the policy. Specific points of contention include: 1. Whether the incident fell within the coverage parameters outlined in the policy. 2. The legitimacy of National Union’s reasons for denying the claim. 3. Any potential bad faith actions by National Union in handling the claim. **Holding**: [Include the court's ruling, e.g., the court found in favor of San Jacinto, ordering National Union to pay the claim, or the court ruled in favor of National Union, upholding the denial of the claim.] **Rationale**: The court's decision was based on [summarize the key legal reasoning used by the court, such as interpretation of policy language, legal precedents, standards for claim denial, etc.]. The judge emphasized [any particular legal principles or precedents that were pivotal in the ruling]. **Conclusion**: The ruling in San Jacinto v. National Union sets a significant precedent regarding [mention any implications for insurance claims, industry standards, etc.]. Parties in similar situations may reference this case to understand the implications of policy language and the obligations of insurers in handling claims. **Note**: For further details, including specific legal statutes or additional context on the parties involved, consult the full court opinion or legal brief for comprehensive insights. --- Please adjust the placeholders and tailor any section specifics based on the actual details of the case and the outcome if available.

San Jacinto v. Nat'l Union


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available