Legal Case Summary

Sandra Marshall v. Honeywell Technology Systems


Date Argued: Tue Dec 08 2015
Case Number: 13-3050
Docket Number: 3019052
Judges:Henderson, Griffith, Randolph
Duration: 42 minutes
Court Name: D.C Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Sandra Marshall v. Honeywell Technology Systems** **Docket Number:** 3019052 **Court:** [Specify Court] **Date:** [Specify relevant date of decision or filing] **Judges:** [List judges if applicable] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Sandra Marshall - **Defendant:** Honeywell Technology Systems **Facts of the Case:** Sandra Marshall filed a lawsuit against Honeywell Technology Systems alleging [specific claims or issues - e.g., employment discrimination, wrongful termination, breach of contract, etc.]. The plaintiff claims that she experienced [briefly describe the circumstances leading to the lawsuit, e.g., discriminatory practices, unsafe work conditions, retaliation, etc.], which she argues violated [cite relevant laws or regulations, if applicable]. **Issues:** The primary legal issues addressed in this case include: 1. Whether Honeywell Technology Systems discriminated against Sandra Marshall based on [specific grounds, e.g., race, gender, age, etc.]. 2. Whether Honeywell's actions constituted [specific legal breach, e.g., a violation of employment law, breach of contract, etc.]. 3. Any defenses raised by Honeywell Technology Systems against the allegations. **Court's Findings:** The court conducted [describe the proceedings, e.g., hearings, testimonies, evidence presented]. The findings revealed [summarize the key findings or conclusions reached by the court regarding the claims made by Marshall and the defense put forth by Honeywell]. **Conclusion:** The court ultimately ruled in favor of [plaintiff or defendant]. If in favor of the plaintiff, the ruling included [details of damages awarded, injunctive relief, if any, or other remedies granted]. If in favor of the defendant, the court dismissed the case based on [briefly describe reasoning]. **Significance of the Case:** This case has implications for [discuss the broader impact or importance, such as workplace policies, employee rights, compliance with regulations, etc.]. It highlights [make any pertinent observations about the legal context or industry standards]. **Future Considerations:** Parties may consider [discuss potential appeals, further legal actions, or implications for future cases]. *Note: This summary is for illustrative purposes, and the actual case details, findings, and legal grounds will depend on the specifics of the case documentation and rulings.*

Sandra Marshall v. Honeywell Technology Systems


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available