Case Summary
**Case Summary: Santokh Parihar v. Eric H. Holder Jr.**
**Docket Number:** 7838693
**Court:** United States Court of Appeals
**Date:** [Insert relevant date]
**Overview:**
The case of Santokh Parihar v. Eric H. Holder Jr. revolves around an immigration-related dispute where Santokh Parihar, the petitioner, challenges a decision made by the Attorney General, Eric H. Holder Jr.
**Key Facts:**
- Santokh Parihar is a citizen of [Country].
- Parihar entered the United States on [Date] and later faced immigration proceedings.
- The case primarily deals with issues of [specific immigration status, eligibility for relief, asylum claims, etc.].
- Parihar argues that he is entitled to [specific relief sought] due to [reasons such as political persecution, fear of harm, etc.].
**Legal Issues:**
- The main legal issue is whether the actions taken by the Attorney General in denying Parihar's application for [specific relief] were justified.
- The case addresses questions of [specific statutes, eligibility requirements, standards of review involved, etc.].
**Arguments:**
- **Petitioner (Parihar):**
- Claims that the lower court erred in its ruling and that there was insufficient consideration of evidence supporting his claims for [asylum, adjustment of status, etc.].
- Argues that he has a well-founded fear of persecution if returned to his home country.
- **Respondent (Holder Jr.):**
- Contends that the decision was consistent with legal standards and that Parihar did not meet the criteria necessary for the relief he sought.
- Emphasizes the findings of previous factual determinations made by immigration authorities.
**Court's Analysis:**
- The court examines the factual background and the circumstances surrounding the denial of relief.
- It considers the legal standards for granting asylum and the evidentiary thresholds required to establish a claim of persecution.
**Decision:**
- The decision made by the court [affirmed/reversed/remanded the lower court's ruling]. The court's findings reflect a balanced consideration of the case's factual and legal complexities.
**Conclusion:**
The ruling in Santokh Parihar v. Eric H. Holder Jr. plays a significant role in shaping the understanding of immigration law, particularly in matters involving asylum and humanitarian relief. This case underscores the complexities faced by individuals navigating the U.S. immigration system and the challenges involved in proving claims of persecution.
**Note:** Specific dates, locations, and detailed outcomes should be filled in with accurate information from the actual case documentation.