Case Summary
**Case Summary: Scepurek v. Board of Trustees of the Northbrook Firefighter's Pension Board, Docket No. 3084780**
**Court:** [Specify the court if known, e.g., Circuit Court, Appellate Court, etc.]
**Date:** [Insert date of the judgment or relevant proceedings]
**Case Background:**
The case involves Plaintiff Joseph Scepurek challenging the decision of the Board of Trustees of the Northbrook Firefighter's Pension Board regarding the pension benefits he is entitled to receive under the applicable pension statutes. The dispute arose after Scepurek, a former firefighter, applied for pension benefits, which the Board denied based on their interpretation of his eligibility and service record.
**Issues Presented:**
1. Whether the Board's denial of Scepurek's pension benefits was consistent with statutory requirements governing firefighter pensions.
2. Whether the Board adequately considered Scepurek's service record and other relevant factors in making its determination.
**Facts:**
- Joseph Scepurek served as a firefighter for the Village of Northbrook for [insert number of years].
- Following his retirement, he filed an application for pension benefits, expecting to receive a monthly pension based on his years of service and the applicable pension formula.
- The Board rejected his application, citing [insert reasons provided by the Board, e.g., alleged insufficient service time, non-compliance with pension contribution rules, etc.].
- Scepurek contended that the Board's reasons were unfounded and did not reflect the true nature of his service and contributions to the pension fund.
**Arguments:**
- **Plaintiff's Argument:** Scepurek argued that he met all eligibility requirements for pension benefits, including [insert specific points such as total service time, payment of contributions, etc.], and that the Board's reasoning lacked legal and factual support.
- **Defendant's Argument:** The Board maintained that their decision was justified based on the interpretation of the pension laws and the application of those laws to Scepurek's case.
**Court's Ruling:**
The court, after reviewing the evidence presented, the arguments from both sides, and applicable pension laws, ruled in favor of [insert ruling, e.g., Scepurek or Board]. The court found that [summarize the court's rationale for its decision, including any legal precedents or statutory interpretations relevant to the case].
**Outcome:**
[Provide the final outcome, which might include an order for the Board to reconsider its decision, the award of pension benefits to Scepurek, or an affirmation of the Board’s decision.]
**Significance:**
This case underscores the importance of clear interpretation and adherence to statutory requirements governing pension benefits for firefighters, as well as the accountability of pension boards in their decision-making processes.
---
*Note: Please specify any additional details such as specific statutes invoked, procedural history, or related cases if applicable.*