Legal Case Summary

Segundo Suenos, LLC v. Marshall Jones


Date Argued: Thu Feb 16 2012
Case Number: 10-56257
Docket Number: 7839673
Judges:Hellerstein, Farris, Fletcher
Duration: 24 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Segundo Suenos, LLC v. Marshall Jones** **Docket Number:** 7839673 **Court:** [Insert Court Name] **Date:** [Insert Date of Ruling] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Segundo Suenos, LLC - **Defendant:** Marshall Jones **Background:** This case involves a dispute between Segundo Suenos, LLC (the Plaintiff) and Marshall Jones (the Defendant). The Plaintiff, a limited liability company, brought forth legal action against the Defendant, alleging various claims related to [insert specific nature of the dispute, e.g., breach of contract, negligence, etc.]. **Facts:** - Segundo Suenos, LLC engaged in [describe the nature of business and any relevant transactions with the Defendant]. - The Plaintiff claimed that the Defendant [describe the specific actions or omissions of the Defendant that led to the lawsuit, e.g., failed to fulfill contractual obligations, caused damage or loss, etc.]. - [Include any relevant details about communications, agreements, or prior dealings between the parties]. **Issues:** The primary issues in this case include: 1. Whether the Defendant breached their contractual obligations to the Plaintiff. 2. The extent of damages incurred by Segundo Suenos, LLC as a result of the Defendant's actions. 3. Any defenses raised by the Defendant, such as [mention any potential defenses like waiver, estoppel, etc.]. **Court Ruling:** - [Summarize the court’s findings, including any rulings on motions, verdict outcomes, and implications]. - If applicable, the court may have awarded damages to the Plaintiff, outlined specific performance requirements, or granted any injunctions or other remedies. **Legal Principles:** This case addressed important legal principles such as [briefly outline the legal theories applied in the case, e.g., contract law, tort law, etc.]. **Conclusion:** The court’s ruling in Segundo Suenos, LLC v. Marshall Jones highlights [mention any significant takeaways, such as implications for contract enforcement, standards for liability, or precedent set by the case]. Further proceedings may be anticipated, including [mention any potential appeals or additional litigation]. **Note:** [Insert any additional comments or notes relevant to the case, including potential impacts on future cases or actions by involved parties]. --- *Please insert relevant specific details where indicated to complete the case summary.*

Segundo Suenos, LLC v. Marshall Jones


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available