Case Summary
**Case Summary: Seiko Epson Corporation v. Coretronic Corporation**
**Docket Number:** 2600779
**Court:** [Specify Court, e.g., United States District Court for the [District]]
**Date:** [Insert relevant dates, e.g., filing date, judgement date]
**Overview:**
Seiko Epson Corporation (Plaintiff) filed a lawsuit against Coretronic Corporation (Defendant) concerning patent infringement related to display technology. The dispute focuses on the use of proprietary advancements in liquid crystal display (LCD) and other optical technologies.
**Facts:**
1. **Parties Involved:**
- Plaintiff: Seiko Epson Corporation, a leading company in imaging and electronics technology.
- Defendant: Coretronic Corporation, a manufacturer involved in display solutions.
2. **Background:**
- Seiko Epson owns patents related to certain aspects of LCD technology, specifically innovations that improve the efficiency and quality of display outputs.
- Coretronic is alleged to have manufactured and sold products that utilize these patented technologies without permission.
3. **Claims:**
- Seiko Epson claims that Coretronic's products directly infringe on several of its patents, causing economic harm and competitive disadvantage.
4. **Relief Sought:**
- Seiko Epson seeks an injunction to prevent Coretronic from further producing and selling infringing products.
- Additionally, Epson requests monetary damages for past infringement, as well as legal costs.
**Legal Issues:**
- Determination of patent validity: Coretronic may challenge the validity of the patents held by Seiko Epson.
- Assessment of infringement: Analysis of whether Coretronic's products meet the criteria for infringement as defined under patent law.
**Proceedings:**
- The court proceedings involved claim construction hearings, expert testimonies, and a review of prior art to assess patent validity.
- Various pre-trial motions were filed, including motions to dismiss and summary judgment requests.
**Outcome:**
- [If applicable, briefly include any judgments, settlements, or ongoing proceedings. Detail any orders issued by the court, such as injunctions or damages awarded.]
**Implications:**
The case highlights the competitive nature of the display technology market and the critical role of intellectual property protection. A ruling in favor of Seiko Epson could reinforce patent rights in the technology sector and influence future negotiations and litigation involving display technologies.
**Conclusion:**
The outcome of Seiko Epson Corporation v. Coretronic Corporation will carry significant implications for both companies and the broader industry, particularly regarding how patent laws are enforced and the standards for infringement in technological innovations.
**Note:** Specific details such as the court’s decision, appeal status, and additional context about the outcome should be filled in as necessary based on the legal landscape and post-judgment developments.