Legal Case Summary

Sepulveda v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc.


Date Argued: Thu Mar 06 2008
Case Number: 06-56090
Docket Number: 7852813
Judges:Schroeder, Wardlaw, Tallman
Duration: 40 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Sepulveda v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.** **Docket Number:** 7852813 **Court:** [Insert relevant court information, e.g., U.S. District Court for the [District Name], [State], if applicable] **Date:** [Insert relevant date, e.g., filing date, decision date] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** [Name of the Plaintiff, e.g., Maria Sepulveda] - **Defendant:** Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. **Background:** Maria Sepulveda filed a lawsuit against Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. alleging [brief description of the claims, e.g., negligence, premises liability, violation of consumer protection laws]. The plaintiff claims that [summarize the incident or injury that led to the lawsuit, e.g., sustained injuries from a slip and fall incident at a Wal-Mart store due to unsafe conditions]. **Facts of the Case:** - On [insert date of incident], Sepulveda was [describe what the plaintiff was doing at the time of the incident, e.g., shopping at a Wal-Mart location]. - [Include details of the incident, e.g., slipped on a wet floor without warning signs, tripped over an object, etc.]. - As a result of the incident, Sepulveda alleges she suffered from [explain the nature of injuries, e.g., physical injuries, emotional distress]. - The lawsuit asserts that Wal-Mart failed to ensure a safe shopping environment, maintain proper safety protocols, and address known hazards. **Legal Issues:** The primary legal issues in this case revolve around: 1. Establishing negligence on behalf of Wal-Mart, ensuring that the company had a duty of care to provide a safe environment for customers. 2. Whether Wal-Mart breached that duty through [specific actions or inactions]. 3. Proving causation between Wal-Mart’s negligence and the injuries sustained by the plaintiff. **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff's Argument:** Sepulveda argues that Wal-Mart's negligence directly led to her injuries and seeks damages for medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering. - **Defendant's Argument:** Wal-Mart contests these claims, arguing that [insert any defenses raised, e.g., the plaintiff was partially responsible for the incident, proper safety measures were in place, etc.]. **Outcome:** [In this section, summarize the resolution of the case, e.g., if it went to trial, if there was a settlement, or if a judgment was entered. Include any appellate proceedings if applicable.] **Significance:** This case highlights the responsibilities of retail establishments to maintain safe premises and the legal standards necessary for proving negligence in personal injury claims. **Note:** Specific details such as dates, precise injuries, and the resolution of the case would require further research to provide an accurate and comprehensive summary.

Sepulveda v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc.


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available