Case Summary
**Case Summary: Sergeant Iwanenko v. Township of Irvington**
**Docket Number:** 2602703
**Court:** [Specify Court if available, e.g., Superior Court, Appellate Division]
**Date:** [Specify Date of Ruling or Filing]
### Overview:
This case involves Sergeant Iwanenko, a police officer in the Township of Irvington, who has brought a legal action against the township. The dispute likely revolves around employment matters, which commonly include allegations of wrongful termination, discrimination, or violation of labor rights, though specific details of the allegations would be necessary for a comprehensive summary.
### Parties Involved:
- **Plaintiff:** Sergeant Iwanenko
- **Defendant:** Township of Irvington
### Legal Issues:
The legal issues at stake may include, but are not limited to:
- Employment discrimination
- Violation of workers’ rights
- Breach of contract
- Failure to provide due process
- Retaliation claims
### Facts of the Case:
- **Employment Background:** Sergeant Iwanenko served as a police sergeant for the Township of Irvington for a designated period, during which certain incidents may have led to a dispute regarding his employment.
- **Nature of Complaint:** The specifics of the complaint may involve allegations that the Township acted unfairly or unlawfully in relation to his employment status, potentially involving documented performance issues or disciplinary actions.
- **Response from Township:** The Township’s defense would typically revolve around justifications for their actions, such as adherence to policies, documentation of issues with conduct or performance, or efforts to address any grievances raised by the Sergeant.
### Proceedings:
Details on the proceedings, including any motions filed, discovery disputes, or court hearings, would be essential to provide a full picture of the case's progress through the legal system.
### Outcome:
The outcome would detail whether the court ruled in favor of Sergeant Iwanenko or the Township of Irvington, along with any orders or judgments issued by the court, including possible remedies or damages awarded, reinstatement, or policy changes mandated by the court.
### Conclusion:
This case illustrates the complexities of employment law within municipal settings, particularly concerning law enforcement personnel. The precedents established may influence future cases concerning police officers' rights and municipalities' responsibilities.
**Note:** For a detailed understanding and accuracy regarding the case events, it is recommended to consult the actual court documents, case law references, or official summaries released by the court.