Case Summary
**Case Summary: Shane Costa v. CSSA**
**Docket Number:** 7839074
**Court:** [Please insert the relevant court information, e.g., District Court of [State or Federal Court]]
**Filing Date:** [Please insert the filing date]
---
**Parties Involved:**
- **Plaintiff:** Shane Costa
- **Defendant:** CSSA (Child Support Services Agency)
---
**Background:**
Shane Costa initiated legal action against the CSSA, challenging the agency’s decision regarding child support obligations. The case centers on the determination of financial responsibilities for child support payments, as outlined by state law and previous agreements.
**Facts:**
1. **Child Support Order:** The CSSA previously issued a child support order mandating payments from Shane Costa due to his status as a non-custodial parent.
2. **Dispute:** Costa contested the amount stipulated, citing changes in his financial circumstances (e.g., loss of employment, medical issues) which he argued warranted a modification of his obligations.
3. **Agency Response:** CSSA maintained that the original order was justified based on the income reported at the time and the standard calculations employed under state guidelines.
4. **Modification Request:** Costa filed a petition for modification, providing evidence of his current financial situation and requesting an adjustment to the payment amounts.
---
**Legal Issues:**
1. **Validity of Child Support Order:** Whether the initial child support order was calculated correctly based on available income data and adherence to statutory guidelines.
2. **Modification Eligibility:** Determining if a substantial change in circumstances exists that justifies a modification of the child support obligations imposed on Costa.
3. **Agency Compliance:** Assessing whether CSSA acted within its legal authority and followed appropriate procedures in relation to modifying or enforcing the child support order.
---
**Court's Findings:**
The court evaluated the evidence presented by both parties, considering the documentation of Costa's financial changes and the statutory framework guiding child support modifications. The court examined the processes followed by CSSA in establishing the child support amount and whether they reasonably responded to Costa's modification request.
---
**Outcome:**
[Please insert the outcome of the case, whether the court ruled in favor of Shane Costa, upheld the original support order of CSSA, or recommended further hearings/modifications/negotiations.]
**Significance:**
This case underscores the importance of accurately assessing child support obligations in light of changing financial circumstances and the role of agencies in ensuring fairness while adhering to statutory mandates.
---
**Next Steps:**
Future implications of this case may require CSSA to review its procedures for evaluating changes in financial circumstances and potentially revise its policies to ensure compliance with the standards of evidence required for modification requests.
---
This summary is meant to provide an overview of the case, based on general legal principles. For precise details and implications, legal professionals should consult case documentation and relevant statutes.