Legal Case Summary

Sharon Ault v. Oberlin College


Date Argued: Thu Apr 23 2015
Case Number: E2014-01950-COA-R3-PT
Docket Number: 2651979
Judges:Not available
Duration: 37 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Sharon Ault v. Oberlin College** **Docket Number:** 2651979 **Court:** [Insert Relevant Court Name] **Filing Date:** [Insert Filing Date] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Sharon Ault - **Defendant:** Oberlin College **Background:** Sharon Ault initiated legal proceedings against Oberlin College, alleging [insert relevant claims, e.g., discrimination, breach of contract, negligence, etc.]. The plaintiff asserts that the college’s actions or policies resulted in [briefly describe the harm or impact suffered by the plaintiff]. **Key Facts:** 1. **Employment Status:** Ault was employed by Oberlin College as [insert position, e.g., a faculty member, staff] during the period relevant to the case. 2. **Incident:** [Describe the incident or series of events that led to the legal claim, including dates and specific actions taken by the parties.] 3. **Allegations:** Ault claims that [summarize the key allegations made against Oberlin College, highlighting specific policies, actions, or failures that are central to the case]. **Legal Issues:** The case raises several legal issues, including but not limited to: - [Insert issue 1: e.g., violation of anti-discrimination laws] - [Insert issue 2: e.g., breach of employment contract] - [Insert issue 3: e.g., failure to provide a safe work environment] **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff’s Argument:** Sharon Ault contends that Oberlin College [summarize the plaintiff's arguments, including the basis for liability and the relief sought]. - **Defendant’s Argument:** Oberlin College responds by [summarize the defenses raised by the college, such as denial of the allegations, justification for actions taken, etc.]. **Outcome:** [If available, insert the ruling of the court or any settlement reached, including key findings or orders made by the court]. **Implications:** The outcome of this case may have significant implications for [insert relevant implications, e.g., college employment practices, policies on discrimination, etc.]. **Conclusion:** Sharon Ault's case against Oberlin College presents critical questions regarding [insert broader themes, such as employee rights, institutional accountability, etc.], and underscores the importance of [insert any relevant theme or principle, e.g., compliance with employment laws, fostering inclusive environments in academic institutions]. --- Please fill in the placeholders with specific details regarding the case as appropriate.

Sharon Ault v. Oberlin College


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available