Legal Case Summary

Sharon Black v. City and County of Honolulu


Date Argued: Mon Feb 11 2013
Case Number: 09-17874
Docket Number: 7838287
Judges:Graber, Bybee, Christen
Duration: 33 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Sharon Black v. City and County of Honolulu** **Docket Number:** 7838287 **Court:** [Specify Court if known, e.g., District Court, Circuit Court, etc.] **Date:** [Specify Date of Filing, if available] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Sharon Black - **Defendant:** City and County of Honolulu **Background:** Sharon Black filed a lawsuit against the City and County of Honolulu, alleging [insert brief description of the claims made by the plaintiff, e.g., negligence, personal injury, discrimination, etc.]. The nature of the case revolves around [summarize the factual background, e.g., an incident that occurred due to city infrastructure, civil rights violations, or other pertinent details]. **Claims:** In her complaint, Black asserts that the City and County of Honolulu [describe the specific legal claims, e.g., violated her rights, was negligent in maintaining public property, failed to uphold local laws, etc.]. The plaintiff seeks [list what the plaintiff is requesting from the court, e.g., damages, injunctions, etc.]. **Legal Arguments:** Black’s legal team argues that [summarize the key legal arguments made by the plaintiff, such as breaches of law, failures of duty, etc.]. They may reference [mention any relevant statutes, ordinances, or case law that support the plaintiff's claims]. On the other hand, the City and County of Honolulu is expected to respond by [describe the expected defense strategies, such as arguing immunity, lack of liability, adherence to regulations, etc.]. **Current Status:** As of the last update, the case is [describe the current status, whether it is still in pre-trial, if motions have been filed, if there is a scheduled hearing, etc.]. **Significance:** This case could have implications for [discuss any broader implications, such as potential impacts on municipal liability, civil rights enforcement, or public safety regulations]. **Next Steps:** The court will next [outline the next steps in the legal process, such as upcoming hearings, deadlines for motions, or other procedural matters]. **Conclusion:** The outcome of this case awaits further proceedings and may set a precedent regarding [summarize potential outcomes and their significance]. *Note: Further details and updates may be necessary as the case progresses.*

Sharon Black v. City and County of Honolulu


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available