Legal Case Summary

Shaun Lowry v. Sherwood Charter School


Date Argued: Wed May 10 2017
Case Number: 15-35060
Docket Number: 6060652
Judges:Bybee, Hurwitz, Rakoff
Duration: 36 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Shaun Lowry v. Sherwood Charter School** **Docket Number:** 6060652 **Court:** [Specify Court, e.g., Circuit Court, State of [State Name]] **Filing Date:** [Provide Date] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Shaun Lowry - **Defendant:** Sherwood Charter School **Background:** Shaun Lowry filed a lawsuit against Sherwood Charter School, seeking redress for actions taken by the school that he claims violated his rights as a student/parent/employee (specific role to be defined). The nature of the complaint typically revolves around issues such as discrimination, breach of contract, failure to provide appropriate educational services, or violation of state educational regulations. **Issues:** The key issues in the case may include: 1. Allegations of discrimination based on [specific grounds, e.g., race, disability]. 2. Claims of insufficient educational resources or support. 3. Any disputes over policies or procedures followed by the charter school. 4. Question of jurisdiction and applicable laws regarding charter schools. **Legal Arguments:** - **Plaintiff's Position:** Shaun Lowry presents evidence and legal arguments to support his claims against Sherwood Charter School, emphasizing its alleged failure to comply with educational standards and protections provided by law. - **Defendant's Position:** Sherwood Charter School may defend itself by arguing that it adhered to all relevant laws and regulations, or that it possesses legal immunity in specific contexts, citing case law or statutory provisions. **Outcome:** The resolution of the case could involve various outcomes, such as: - A ruling in favor of Shaun Lowry, which could lead to compensation or changes in the school's practices. - A ruling in favor of Sherwood Charter School, where the court dismisses the case based on the merits of the school's arguments. - Potential settlement discussions between the parties, leading to an out-of-court resolution. **Next Steps:** Following the legal proceedings, the parties may either await the court's ruling or engage in further negotiations if a settlement opportunity arises. The case's outcome may also encourage policy revisions at Sherwood Charter School or prompt appeals if one party is dissatisfied with the court's decision. **Implications:** The case could have significant implications for educational policy and practices within charter schools, particularly concerning student rights and institutional accountability. **Note:** Additional details, including the specific legal claims, evidence presented, court rulings, and any appeals filed, would provide more comprehensive insight into the case dynamics. This summary serves as an overview based on the provided docket number and case title.

Shaun Lowry v. Sherwood Charter School


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available