Legal Case Summary

Shawn Francis v. M.D. Steven Hammond


Date Argued: Mon Nov 04 2013
Case Number: 13-35317
Docket Number: 7837114
Judges:Schroeder, Paez, Berzon
Duration: 21 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Shawn Francis v. M.D. Steven Hammond** **Docket Number:** 7837114 **Court:** [Insert Court Name] **Filing Date:** [Insert Filing Date] **Case Overview:** In the case of Shawn Francis v. M.D. Steven Hammond, plaintiff Shawn Francis brought a medical malpractice lawsuit against Dr. Steven Hammond. The case centers on allegations of negligence in medical care and treatment provided by Dr. Hammond, which the plaintiff claims resulted in significant harm. **Factual Background:** Shawn Francis alleges that during a medical procedure conducted by Dr. Hammond, he failed to adhere to the accepted standards of care. The plaintiff contends that this negligence led to various complications affecting his health. Evidence presented in the case includes medical records, expert testimony, and documentation of the outcomes following the procedure. **Legal Issues:** The primary legal issue revolves around the determination of whether Dr. Hammond's actions constituted a breach of the standard of care required of medical professionals in similar circumstances. The plaintiff must establish that Dr. Hammond acted negligently and that this negligence directly caused the injuries claimed. **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff's Argument:** Shawn Francis argues that Dr. Hammond failed to diagnose and treat a condition appropriately, which exacerbated his medical issues. The plaintiff seeks compensation for medical expenses, pain and suffering, and loss of quality of life. - **Defendant's Argument:** Dr. Hammond maintains that he followed appropriate medical guidelines and that the outcomes were in line with the inherent risks associated with the procedure. The defense argues that the plaintiff's injuries were not a direct result of any action or inaction on the part of Dr. Hammond. **Outcome:** [Insert the outcome of the case if available, e.g., verdict, settlement, etc. Include any specific judgments, awards, or implications for future cases.] **Conclusion:** The case of Shawn Francis v. M.D. Steven Hammond raises important questions regarding medical malpractice and the responsibility of healthcare providers. As the court evaluates the evidence and testimonies, the outcome may have implications for both the plaintiff and the broader medical community concerning standards of care and patient rights. **Note:** For additional or updated details regarding the case specifics, including dates and outcomes, please refer to legal databases or court records.

Shawn Francis v. M.D. Steven Hammond


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available