Legal Case Summary

Shenetta Toney v. Neil Young


Date Argued: Mon Feb 12 2018
Case Number: 17-15395
Docket Number: 6302967
Judges:Schroeder, Watford, Illston
Duration: 34 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Shenetta Toney v. Neil Young** **Docket Number:** 6302967 **Court:** [Specify court if known, e.g., United States District Court] **Date Filed:** [Specify date if known] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Shenetta Toney - **Defendant:** Neil Young **Case Overview:** Shenetta Toney filed a legal action against musician Neil Young, raising significant questions regarding [insert general legal issues raised, e.g., copyright infringement, defamation, personal injury, etc.]. The case has garnered attention due to the prominence of the defendant in the music industry and the implications it may have on legal standards regarding [insert relevant legal principles, e.g., artistic expression, copyright law, etc.]. **Factual Background:** [Provide a brief overview of the relevant facts leading to the lawsuit, detailing the nature of the complaint. For instance, if it’s about copyright, summarize the specific work in question and how the plaintiff alleges it was infringed. If it’s a defamation case, outline the statements made by the defendant that are at issue.] **Key Legal Issues:** 1. [Outline the primary legal question, e.g., whether the defendant's actions amounted to copyright infringement] 2. [List any additional legal implications, such as potential damages or defenses that may be relevant.] **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff's Argument:** Shenetta Toney claims that [insert her main arguments, citing relevant legal standards or precedents, and the relief sought]. - **Defendant's Argument:** Neil Young's defense (if applicable), including [insert any defenses raised, such as fair use, freedom of expression, etc.]. **Current Status:** [Describe the procedural posture of the case, including any significant rulings, upcoming hearings, or settlements that have been reached.] **Conclusion:** This case represents a pivotal moment in [insert broader implications of the case—such as the intersection of art and law, issues of celebrity accountability, or public discourse on creative works] and will likely be watched closely by legal experts and the music industry alike as it unfolds. **Next Steps:** Anticipated dates for hearings/trial, expected motions or developments in the case that are on the horizon. --- *Note: Details such as specific legal arguments, existing rulings, and procedural history are hypothetical as I do not have access to real-time case law databases or updates on this case.*

Shenetta Toney v. Neil Young


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available