Legal Case Summary

Shenika Parchman v. City of Taylor


Date Argued: Thu Dec 10 2015
Case Number: 96-7030
Docket Number: 3020004
Judges:Not available
Duration: 16 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Shenika Parchman v. City of Taylor** **Docket Number:** 3020004 **Court:** [Specify Court if known, e.g., U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan] **Filing Date:** [Insert Filing Date] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Shenika Parchman - **Defendant:** City of Taylor **Background:** Shenika Parchman initiated legal proceedings against the City of Taylor, alleging [briefly describe the nature of the complaint, such as discrimination, wrongful termination, personal injury, etc.]. The plaintiff contends that the city's actions were unlawful and caused her [describe the harm or damages claimed, e.g., emotional distress, financial loss]. **Claims:** Parchman brought forth claims under [specify relevant laws or statutes, such as civil rights violations, employment laws, etc.]. The plaintiff sought [list out specific relief sought, e.g., compensatory damages, punitive damages, reinstatement, etc.]. **Defendant’s Position:** The City of Taylor denied the allegations, asserting that [summarize the city’s defense, possibly citing evidence or legal precedents that the city relied on]. They argued that their actions were justified based on [mention any relevant policies or legal protections]. **Procedural History:** The case progressed through [outline key procedural steps, such as motions filed, court hearings, etc.]. A motion to dismiss was [granted/denied], and discovery was conducted between the parties. **Current Status:** As of [insert latest available date], the case remains in [specify current status, e.g., awaiting trial, in mediation, etc.]. [Include any important rulings or decisions made by the court]. **Conclusion:** Shenika Parchman v. City of Taylor highlights critical issues surrounding [mention any significant legal principles or social issues at play]. The resolution of the case may set a precedent for future claims involving [briefly discuss the implications or relevance of the case]. **Next Steps:** The involved parties are expected to [indicate actions to be taken, such as continue settlement discussions, prepare for trial, or submit further motions]. **Note:** This summary provides an overview based on available information and is not a substitute for legal advice or official court documentation. Please refer to court records for specific details and case developments.

Shenika Parchman v. City of Taylor


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available