Case Summary
**Case Summary: SI03, Inc. v. Bodybuilding.com, LLC**
**Docket Number:** 7846501
**Court:** [Insert appropriate court, if known]
**Date Filed:** [Insert filing date, if known]
**Judge:** [Insert judge's name, if known]
**Nature of the Case:** Trademark Infringement / Trade Dress Infringement
**Parties Involved:**
- **Plaintiff:** SI03, Inc.
- **Defendant:** Bodybuilding.com, LLC
**Background:**
SI03, Inc. is a company engaged in the production and sale of nutritional supplements and related products. The plaintiff alleges that Bodybuilding.com, a well-known online retailer of sports nutrition products, has engaged in acts that infringe upon SI03’s trademarks and trade dress associated with its products. The specific trademarks and/or trade dress at issue include [insert specific trademarks if known], which SI03 claims are unique to its brand and have developed a secondary meaning in the marketplace.
**Allegations:**
1. **Trademark Infringement:** SI03 contends that Bodybuilding.com has unlawfully used its trademarks in a way that is likely to cause confusion among consumers regarding the source of the products. They assert that this confuses customers and dilutes the distinctive quality of their brand.
2. **Trade Dress Infringement:** The plaintiff further claims that Bodybuilding.com has mimicked the overall appearance and packaging of SI03’s products, which constitutes unfair competition and misrepresentation, leading to consumer confusion.
3. **Unfair Competition:** SI03 alleges that Bodybuilding.com’s actions not only infringe upon their trademarks but also constitute unfair competition under applicable state and federal laws.
**Relief Sought:**
SI03, Inc. seeks various forms of relief from the court, including:
- An injunction to prevent Bodybuilding.com from continuing to use the contested trademarks and trade dress.
- An award of damages, including loss of profits and statutory damages, for the infringement.
- The recovery of attorney fees and costs incurred as a result of the litigation.
**Current Status:**
As of the latest available information, the case is ongoing, with possible motions filed by both parties to address the claims and defenses. A procedural history includes [insert any known motions or rulings, if available], with the next court date scheduled for [insert date if known].
**Significance:**
The outcome of this case is anticipated to have implications for trademark protections in the nutritional supplements market and how businesses present their products in ways that may impact consumer perception and brand identity.
**Note:**
Details regarding specific court filings, dates, outcomes, and legal strategies would require access to the case file or additional legal databases to provide a more comprehensive analysis.