Case Summary
**Case Summary: Slocum v. The Board of Trustees of the State Universities Retirement System**
**Docket Number:** 3087349
**Court:** [Insert Court Name]
**Date:** [Insert Date of Decision]
**Background:**
The case of Slocum v. The Board of Trustees of the State Universities Retirement System involves a dispute regarding the retirement benefits of the plaintiff, Slocum, who was a member of the retirement system. Slocum challenged a decision made by the Board of Trustees concerning the calculation or eligibility of retirement benefits, claiming that the Board's decision was incorrect based on the applicable statutes and regulations.
**Facts:**
- Slocum served in a qualifying position at a state university and contributed to the retirement system as required.
- Upon reaching retirement age, Slocum applied for retirement benefits, expecting a certain amount based on years of service and salary history.
- The Board of Trustees, however, determined a different amount or denied certain benefits, sparking Slocum's challenge.
**Issues:**
1. Whether the Board of Trustees properly calculated Slocum’s retirement benefits in accordance with the governing statutes and regulations of the retirement system.
2. Whether Slocum was eligible for the disputed benefits based on his service record and contributions.
**Arguments:**
- **Plaintiff’s Argument (Slocum):** Slocum contended that the decision made by the Board was erroneous, and cited specific statutory provisions and precedents that supported his claim for a higher benefit amount.
- **Defendant's Argument (Board of Trustees):** The Board maintained that their calculations were in compliance with the applicable laws and that Slocum’s interpretation of the regulations was flawed.
**Ruling:**
The court ruled in favor of [Slocum/Board of Trustees], finding that [insert the court's analysis, reasoning, and final decision]. The court emphasized [any key points of the decision that clarify the reasoning behind the ruling, such as interpretation of statutes, credibility of evidence, etc.].
**Conclusion:**
The ruling has implications for similar cases involving retirement benefits under the state universities' retirement system, particularly regarding the calculation methods and eligibility criteria. [Add any additional remarks about the significance of the case in broader legal context or potential appeal process].
(Note: Where specific information is not provided in the original request, placeholders have been included. Please fill in the gaps with relevant details regarding court name, date, and ruling.)