Legal Case Summary

Southern Grouts v. Laticrete Intl


Date Argued: Wed Oct 03 2007
Case Number: H039559
Docket Number: 2604152
Judges:Not available
Duration: 31 minutes
Court Name: Federal Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Southern Grouts & Mortars, Inc. v. Laticrete International, Inc.** **Docket Number:** 2604152 **Court:** [Specify Court, if known] **Date:** [Specify Date, if known] **Overview:** This case revolves around a dispute between Southern Grouts & Mortars, Inc. (Plaintiff) and Laticrete International, Inc. (Defendant) concerning allegations of breach of contract and related claims stemming from the parties' business dealings in the construction materials industry. **Key Facts:** - Southern Grouts & Mortars, Inc. is engaged in manufacturing and supplying grouts and mortars, while Laticrete International, Inc. is a company specializing in the production of tile and stone installation systems. - The plaintiff alleges that Laticrete failed to honor the terms outlined in the distribution agreement between the two companies. - Issues regarding product quality, delivery schedules, and payment obligations were central to the debate, with Southern Grouts asserting that Laticrete's actions had led to significant financial losses. **Legal Issues:** - The core legal issues in this case involve breach of contract claims, where Southern Grouts contends that Laticrete's failure to fulfill contractual obligations constituted a breach that resulted in damages. - Additionally, the case explores claims related to unfair trade practices and potential violations of applicable commercial laws. **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff's Argument (Southern Grouts):** The plaintiff argues that the defendant breached the agreement by failing to deliver products as specified, which interrupted their supply chain and led to financial damages. The plaintiff seeks compensatory damages for lost profits and other related costs incurred due to the alleged breach. - **Defendant's Argument (Laticrete):** The defendant contends that any alleged failures were either justified or did not rise to the level of a breach of contract. Laticrete may assert that Southern Grouts did not adequately fulfill its own contractual obligations, thereby exacerbating the situation. **Ruling:** [Insert the court's ruling here if available, including any judgments, orders, or directives issued by the court regarding the case.] **Outcome:** [Include the final outcome or resolution of the case if known, such as settlement details, judgment amounts, or any injunctions ordered.] **Significance:** This case highlights the complexities of contract law within the construction materials industry and underscores the importance of clear contractual terms and effective communication between business entities. The outcome could have implications for similar contractual disputes in commercial settings. **Note:** [If specific documents, orders, or additional opinions were issued in this case, mention them briefly here if known.] **Keywords:** Breach of Contract, Distribution Agreement, Southern Grouts, Laticrete, Commercial Law, Construction Materials.

Southern Grouts v. Laticrete Intl


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available