Legal Case Summary

Spokane LEFCU v. Marcella Barker


Date Argued: Mon Oct 03 2016
Case Number: 14-60028
Docket Number: 4468950
Judges:W. Fletcher, Gould, N.R. Smith
Duration: 25 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Spokane LEFCU v. Marcella Barker** **Docket Number:** 4468950 **Court:** [Specify the court, e.g., Superior Court of Washington] **Date:** [Specify the date of the decision, if available] **Parties:** - **Plaintiff:** Spokane Local Employees Federal Credit Union (LEFCU) - **Defendant:** Marcella Barker **Background:** This case involves a dispute between Spokane LEFCU and Marcella Barker regarding [briefly describe the nature of the dispute, e.g., breach of contract, loan default, etc.]. The credit union claims that Barker failed to meet her obligations under a loan agreement, resulting in [describe the consequences, e.g., unpaid balances, damages, etc.]. **Legal Issues:** 1. Whether Marcella Barker breached her contractual obligations to Spokane LEFCU. 2. Whether Spokane LEFCU is entitled to recover damages as a result of the alleged breach. **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff’s Arguments:** Spokane LEFCU asserts that Barker has defaulted on her loan payments, citing specific dates and amounts that remain unpaid. The credit union seeks [specify the relief sought, e.g., repayment of the loan amount, interest, legal fees, etc.]. - **Defendant’s Arguments:** Marcella Barker contends that she was not in default and may present defenses such as [mention possible defenses, e.g., wrongful termination of agreement, lack of proper notification, etc.]. Barker may argue that the credit union's claims are unfounded or that she is entitled to offsets or counterclaims due to [mention any claims, if applicable]. **Court’s Findings:** [Summarize the court's analysis, including whether it found in favor of the plaintiff or defendant, the rationale behind the decision, and any legal principles applied.] **Conclusion:** The court ruled in favor of [Plaintiff/Defendant] and determined that [briefly state the ruling, including any obligations or reparations ordered by the court]. This case underscores [mention any relevant legal implications or significance]. **Note:** Further details about the case, including specific arguments, evidence presented, and the final ruling, would be located in the court records or legal databases related to the case.

Spokane LEFCU v. Marcella Barker


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available