Case Summary
**Case Summary: Stanley Ballenger v. J. Dale Owens**
**Docket Number:** 2599235
### Case Overview:
The case of Stanley Ballenger v. J. Dale Owens involves a legal dispute between the plaintiff, Stanley Ballenger, and the defendant, J. Dale Owens. The specifics of the case concern the issues raised by Ballenger against Owens, which may relate to a variety of legal matters such as contract disputes, personal injury claims, or other civil actions.
### Key Parties:
- **Plaintiff:** Stanley Ballenger
- **Defendant:** J. Dale Owens
### Facts of the Case:
- The details surrounding the occurrences leading up to the dispute are crucial for understanding the claims and defenses mounted by both parties.
- The case may involve a series of events or actions taken by Owens that Ballenger argues resulted in damages or harm.
### Legal Issues:
- The central legal issues likely revolve around negligence, breach of contract, liability, or statutory interpretation, depending on the circumstances of the case.
- The arguments presented will address whether Owens acted within the bounds of the law and if Ballenger suffered damages as a result.
### Proceedings:
- The case has gone through various legal proceedings, including motions, hearings, and potentially a trial.
- Evidence and testimonies would have been presented by both parties to support their claims and defenses.
### Outcomes:
- The outcome of the case may involve a ruling in favor of either Ballenger or Owens, potentially resulting in damages, injunctions, or other legal remedies.
- The court's decision will also reflect on the interpretation of relevant laws and precedents guiding the case.
### Conclusion:
The resolution of Stanley Ballenger v. J. Dale Owens serves to highlight important legal principles relevant to the issues at hand. The implications of this case may extend beyond the immediate parties involved and contribute to broader legal understandings or practices.
(Note: Without access to specific case details, the summary is generalized and hypothetically constructed. For precise information, accessing case records or legal databases is recommended.)