Legal Case Summary

STANLEY v. CARR-GOTTSTEIN PROP


Date Argued: Wed Jul 07 2004
Case Number: 03-35200
Docket Number: 7859600
Judges:Hall, Kleinfeld, Wardlaw
Duration: 27 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Stanley v. Carr-Gottstein Properties** **Docket Number:** 7859600 **Court:** [Insert relevant court information, e.g., Superior Court of [State]] **Date:** [Insert relevant date of the judgment or filing] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Stanley - **Defendant:** Carr-Gottstein Properties **Background:** In the case of Stanley v. Carr-Gottstein Properties, the plaintiff, Stanley, brought a lawsuit against Carr-Gottstein Properties, alleging [insert specific claims or causes of action, e.g., breach of contract, negligence, housing discrimination, etc.]. The dispute centers around [insert context of the issue, e.g., a lease agreement, property management issues, etc.]. **Factual Allegations:** Stanley claimed that [provide key factual allegations made by the plaintiff, e.g., the defendant failed to maintain the property, improperly evicted the plaintiff, or did not honor the terms of a lease agreement]. The plaintiff sought remedy for [insert damages sought, e.g., financial compensation, specific performance, or injunctive relief]. **Defendant's Position:** Carr-Gottstein Properties denied the allegations and contended that [insert key defenses raised by the defendant, e.g., compliance with lease terms, absence of negligence, or any applicable legal defenses such as statutes of limitations]. **Court Proceedings:** The case went through [insert relevant stages of the litigation process, e.g., pretrial motions, discovery disputes, motions for summary judgment]. [Include any notable court rulings or findings, such as admissibility of evidence or orders on discovery.] **Outcome:** The court ultimately ruled in favor of [state whether the plaintiff or defendant prevailed]. The ruling was based on [summarize the key points of law or facts that influenced the court's decision]. The court [insert any specific orders or relief granted, if applicable]. **Impact:** The decision in Stanley v. Carr-Gottstein Properties has implications for [discuss broader implications for similar cases in property law, landlord-tenant relations, or any relevant legal principles]. **Conclusion:** This case highlights the complexities involved in [insert relevant legal issues or societal implications]. The court's ruling is significant for the ongoing discourse on [mention any important legal principles, rights, or repertoires relevant to the case]. **Note:** For detailed legal analysis, refer to case law research and court documents specific to this case for further insights into the legal reasoning and its implications. --- Please modify the sections in brackets with accurate details pertaining to the specific case, if available.

STANLEY v. CARR-GOTTSTEIN PROP


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available