Case Summary
**Case Summary: Starla Rollins v. SEIU-UHW, Docket Number 3060151**
**Court:** California Public Employment Relations Board
**Date:** [Insert Date of Decision]
**Parties Involved:**
- **Plaintiff:** Starla Rollins
- **Defendant:** Service Employees International Union - United Healthcare Workers (SEIU-UHW)
**Background:**
Starla Rollins, an employee represented by SEIU-UHW, filed a complaint against the union alleging unfair labor practices. The complaint arose from claims that the union failed to provide adequate representation and support during a workplace grievance process.
**Key Issues:**
The primary issues in this case included:
1. Whether SEIU-UHW demonstrated negligence in its duty to represent Rollins in her grievance.
2. Whether the union’s actions (or lack thereof) constituted a violation of Rollins' rights under the applicable labor laws.
**Facts:**
- Rollins was an active member of SEIU-UHW and sought assistance from the union regarding a workplace dispute with her employer.
- She alleged that the union did not properly advocate on her behalf, failed to communicate important information regarding her case, and did not follow up adequately.
- The union countered that it had acted appropriately and within its rights, suggesting that Rollins’ expectations were beyond the scope of what could be reasonably provided.
**Outcome:**
The board found that SEIU-UHW had not met its duty of fair representation in regard to Rollins’ grievance. The findings indicated that there was significant evidence that the union's inaction negatively impacted Rollins' ability to resolve the workplace dispute effectively.
**Conclusion:**
The decision emphasized the importance of unions adhering to their obligation to represent their members diligently. As a result, the board ordered SEIU-UHW to take corrective actions, which may include providing proper representation and communication in future grievances involving Rollins and potentially reforming certain internal procedures to ensure better service to all members.
**Significance:**
This case reinforces the responsibilities of labor unions in maintaining the trust and expectations of their members. It highlights the legal standards for fair representation and sets a precedent for similar cases regarding the accountability of unions to their members.
[Note: Specific dates, procedural history, and particular orders made by the Board should be included if available for a comprehensive case summary.]