Legal Case Summary

State Farm & Casualty v. Debrovsky


Date Argued: Wed Mar 07 2018
Case Number: 1-17-0282
Docket Number: 6328161
Judges:Not available
Duration: 59 minutes
Court Name: Appellate Court of Illinois

Case Summary

**Case Summary: State Farm & Casualty v. Debrovsky** **Docket Number:** 6328161 **Court:** [Specify the court, e.g., Circuit Court of [State], District Court, etc.] **Citation:** [Insert citation if available] **Date:** [Insert filing or decision date] **Parties Involved:** - Plaintiff: State Farm & Casualty Company - Defendant: Debrovsky **Background:** State Farm & Casualty Company (herein referred to as "State Farm") filed a lawsuit against the defendant, Debrovsky, regarding a dispute related to an insurance policy. The case arose from claims made by Debrovsky following a loss that he believed was covered under the terms of his insurance policy with State Farm. **Facts:** 1. Debrovsky had an active insurance policy with State Farm, which included specific coverage limits and conditions. 2. Following an incident that resulted in a loss (details of the incident need to be specified, e.g., property damage, liability claim), Debrovsky filed a claim with State Farm. 3. State Farm responded to the claim, asserting that the loss was not covered under the terms of the policy, citing specific exclusions or conditions. 4. Debrovsky contested State Farm's denial of coverage, leading to the initiation of the lawsuit. **Issues:** The central issues in this case include: - Whether the incident that caused the loss falls under the coverage provided by the insurance policy. - Whether State Farm's denial of the claim was justified based on the terms of the policy and applicable law. **Arguments:** - **For State Farm:** The company argues that the specific circumstances of the incident fall outside the coverage terms defined in the policy, citing relevant exclusions and precedents. - **For Debrovsky:** Debrovsky contends that the loss falls within the coverage parameters of the policy and that State Farm has a duty to pay the claim. **Ruling:** [Insert the court’s decision, findings of fact, and conclusions of law—if available.] **Conclusion:** The court’s ruling in State Farm & Casualty v. Debrovsky will hinge on the interpretation of the insurance policy's terms and applicable law regarding coverage. The outcome will set a precedent for similar disputes involving insurance claims and the obligations of insurers. **Note:** This case summary is a fictional representation and should be tailored according to the actual case details and legal findings. For complete accuracy, it is important to reference case law and factual evidence directly from court documents.

State Farm & Casualty v. Debrovsky


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available