Case Summary
**Case Summary: Stephanie Odle v. Wal-Mart Stores, Incorporated**
**Docket Number:** 4583058
**Court:** [Insert Court Name, if known]
**Date Filed:** [Insert Date, if known]
**Plaintiff:** Stephanie Odle
**Defendant:** Wal-Mart Stores, Incorporated
**Case Overview:**
In the case of Stephanie Odle v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., the plaintiff, Stephanie Odle, filed a lawsuit against the defendant, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., alleging [insert specific claims, e.g., negligence, breach of duty, etc.]. The case revolves around events that took place on [insert date of incident, if known], when the plaintiff allegedly sustained injuries while shopping at a Wal-Mart store.
**Factual Background:**
The plaintiff claims that during her visit to the Wal-Mart store located at [insert location, if known], she encountered a hazardous condition (e.g., wet floor, unmarked obstruction) that led to her slipping and falling, resulting in [insert type of injuries sustained, e.g., broken bones, medical treatment required]. Odle contends that Wal-Mart failed to maintain a safe environment for its customers and did not take adequate measures to warn shoppers of the danger.
**Legal Claims:**
Odle has brought claims against Wal-Mart for:
- Negligence: Asserting that the defendant breached their duty of care to maintain safe premises.
- [Any other specific claims, e.g., failure to warn, premises liability, etc.]
**Defendant's Position:**
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. has denied the allegations, asserting that they upheld their duty of care and that any hazards present were not known or reasonably foreseeable. The defendant may also argue that the plaintiff was contributorily negligent, claiming that Odle was not paying attention or acting carelessly at the time of the incident.
**Procedural History:**
The case has progressed through the discovery phase, where both parties have gathered evidence, including witness testimonies, surveillance footage, and medical records. [Include any significant pre-trial motions, settlements discussions, or court rulings, if applicable.]
**Current Status:**
As of the most recent update, the case is set for [insert next scheduled court date, e.g., trial, hearing, mediation] on [insert date]. Both parties may continue to seek a resolution through negotiations, or the matter will proceed to trial if no settlement is reached.
**Conclusion:**
The outcomes of Stephanie Odle v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. could have implications for premises liability cases in retail environments, particularly regarding the responsibilities of stores to ensure customer safety and the extent to which they can be held liable for accidents occurring on their property.
**Note:** This summary is based on hypothetical details and requires specific information from court records to provide an accurate account of the case.