Legal Case Summary

Stephany Swart v. Surendra Pawar


Date Argued: Thu Mar 23 2017
Case Number: 15-2519
Docket Number: 4621485
Judges:Diana Gribbon Motz, Stephanie D. Thacker, Pamela A. Harris
Duration: 37 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Stephany Swart v. Surendra Pawar (Docket Number: 4621485)** **Court:** [Specify the Court; e.g., Superior Court, County Court, etc.] **Jurisdiction:** [Specify the Jurisdiction; e.g., State of New York, State of California, etc.] **Date of Filing:** [Insert Filing Date] ### Parties Involved: - **Plaintiff:** Stephany Swart - **Defendant:** Surendra Pawar ### Case Background: The case revolves around a dispute between Stephany Swart and Surendra Pawar. The specific details of the dispute may involve allegations of [insert relevant causes such as negligence, breach of contract, personal injury, etc.], depending on the context provided within the case documents. ### Key Facts: 1. **Incident/Accusation:** [Include a brief description of the incident that led to the lawsuit, including dates, locations, and nature of the dispute.] 2. **Claims:** Stephany Swart [describe the claims made against Surendra Pawar—e.g., negligence, liability, damages sought]. 3. **Response:** Surendra Pawar's defense included [summarize the response provided by the defendant, including any counterclaims or defenses raised]. ### Legal Issues: - [List the primary legal issues that the court had to address, such as liability, damages, evidence admissibility, etc.] ### Court Proceedings: - **Motions:** [Summarize any important motions filed by either party, including motions to dismiss, summary judgment, etc.] - **Hearings:** [Describe key hearings, if applicable, and any critical rulings made by the judge.] - **Witnesses & Evidence:** [Briefly outline any key witnesses and the type of evidence presented during the trial.] ### Ruling: [Summarize the court’s findings and the final ruling, including any orders for compensation, injunctive relief, or dismissal.] ### Conclusion: The outcome of the case had implications for [briefly describe any broader implications of the case on law, policy, or other relevant areas]. The court's decision will serve as a precedent for similar cases involving [specific details connected to the case]. ### Further Actions: - [Note any ongoing obligations for the parties involved, appeals filed, or follow-up actions that may affect the case's outcome.] This case summary is intended to provide a concise overview of the case of Stephany Swart v. Surendra Pawar under docket number 4621485 and should be supplemented with specific legal references and details from the actual case documents for full comprehension.

Stephany Swart v. Surendra Pawar


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available