Legal Case Summary

Stephen Shoemaker v. Robert Taylor


Date Argued: Fri Dec 07 2012
Case Number: 11-56476
Docket Number: 7838486
Judges:Pregerson, Paez, Hurwitz
Duration: 35 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Stephen Shoemaker v. Robert Taylor** **Docket Number:** 7838486 **Court:** [Specify the court name, e.g., Superior Court, District Court, etc.] **Date:** [Insert the date of the decision or filing] **Parties:** - **Plaintiff:** Stephen Shoemaker - **Defendant:** Robert Taylor **Background:** This case involves a dispute between Stephen Shoemaker (the Plaintiff) and Robert Taylor (the Defendant). The nature of the conflict arises from [briefly outline the context of the dispute, e.g., contract issues, personal injury claim, property dispute, etc.]. The plaintiff alleges that [summarize the plaintiff's claims and the basis for those claims]. **Facts:** 1. Stephen Shoemaker contends that [detail the key facts that lead to the dispute, including relevant dates, actions taken by each party, and any agreements or contracts involved]. 2. Robert Taylor responds by [summarize the defendant's position and any counterclaims or defenses raised against the plaintiff’s allegations]. 3. [Include any significant evidence or documentation presented by either party, such as contracts, correspondence, witness statements, etc.] **Legal Issues:** The primary legal issues in this case include: - [List the main legal questions or issues, such as breach of contract, negligence, etc.] - [Discuss any relevant laws or legal precedents that are applicable to the case.] **Court’s Findings:** The court reviewed the evidence presented, including [details about testimony, documents, or expert opinions]. After considering the arguments, the court found that: 1. [Summarize the court's ruling on the key legal issues]. 2. [Discuss any determinations regarding liability, damages, or other legal outcomes]. **Conclusion:** In conclusion, the court ruled in favor of [indicate whether the court ruled for the plaintiff or the defendant and the basis for that ruling]. The outcome of this case may have implications for [discuss any potential broader impacts or future considerations related to the case]. The parties were ordered to [summarize any specific orders given by the court, such as payment of damages, enforcement of contracts, etc.]. **Next Steps:** [If applicable, outline any options for appeal or further proceedings that might follow the court's decision]. **Note:** The specific details and outcomes of the case are subject to change based on the court's ruling and any subsequent legal actions taken by the parties involved. Always refer to the official court documents for the most accurate and detailed information.

Stephen Shoemaker v. Robert Taylor


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available