Legal Case Summary

Steven Guzman v. A. Lamarque


Date Argued: Tue Apr 13 2010
Case Number: 09-16051
Docket Number: 7847766
Judges:Kozinski, Noonan, Callahan
Duration: 40 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Steven Guzman v. A. Lamarque, Docket Number 7847766** **Court:** [Specify the court, if available] **Filing Date:** [Specify the filing date, if available] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Steven Guzman - **Defendant:** A. Lamarque **Case Background:** Steven Guzman filed a lawsuit against A. Lamarque, seeking relief for issues stemming from [specific claims or allegations should be noted here, e.g., wrongful conviction, denial of rights, etc.]. The case primarily focuses on [briefly describe the nature of the dispute, e.g., constitutional violations, negligence, failure to protect rights, etc.]. **Legal Issues:** The case raises several legal questions, including: 1. [Issue 1: e.g., Did the defendant violate Guzman's constitutional rights?] 2. [Issue 2: e.g., Was there sufficient evidence to support Guzman's claims?] 3. [Any additional legal issues pertinent to the case] **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff's Argument:** Guzman contended that [describe key points of the plaintiff's argument, including any evidence presented, legal precedents cited, and the relief sought]. - **Defendant's Argument:** A. Lamarque argued that [describe key points of the defendant's argument, including defenses raised, counterarguments, and any motion to dismiss or other procedural issues that were addressed]. **Court's Findings:** [Summarize the outcome of the case, including any rulings made by the court, findings of fact, and conclusions of law, if applicable. Discuss whether the court ruled in favor of Guzman or Lamarque and any reasoning provided in the opinion.] **Conclusion:** The case of Steven Guzman v. A. Lamarque involved critical legal discussions surrounding [summarize the broader implications of the case, such as civil rights, state accountability, etc.]. The court's decision will impact future cases involving similar issues and set a precedent in the jurisdiction. **Notes:** [Include any additional remarks about the case—e.g., pending appeals, potential next steps, or implications for similar cases.] --- **Disclaimer:** This summary is for informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice. For specific legal inquiries or detailed understanding, consult a legal professional.

Steven Guzman v. A. Lamarque


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available