Legal Case Summary

Stevie Lamar Fields v. Jeanne Woodford, Warden.


Date Argued: Tue Jun 21 2005
Case Number: 00-99005
Docket Number: 7857886
Judges:Kozinski, Rymer, Silverman
Duration: 67 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Stevie Lamar Fields v. Jeanne Woodford, Warden** **Docket Number:** 7857886 **Court:** [Insert Court Name, if known] **Date:** [Insert Date, if known] **Background:** Stevie Lamar Fields filed a petition against Jeanne Woodford, the warden, regarding matters related to his incarceration. The case revolves around legal issues pertaining to the treatment of inmates, prison conditions, or specific grievances raised by Fields against the warden and the prison administration. **Facts:** - Stevie Lamar Fields was imprisoned under circumstances that he claims violate his rights. - The specific allegations may include wrongful treatment, denial of due process, inadequate medical care, or other constitutional violations. - Fields seeks a resolution from the court that may include a request for injunctive relief, a declaration of rights, or damages. **Issues:** 1. Did the actions or inactions of Warden Jeanne Woodford constitute a violation of Fields' constitutional rights? 2. Are the conditions of confinement under which Fields is held lawful and just? **Holding:** The court will determine if the claims presented by Fields have merit and if there are sufficient grounds for a legal remedy against the warden. **Legal Reasoning:** The court's analysis will likely focus on: - The applicable constitutional rights (e.g., Eighth Amendment rights against cruel and unusual punishment). - The standard of deliberate indifference in evaluating claims against prison officials. - Relevant case law and statutes governing prison conditions and inmate rights. **Outcome:** The outcome of the case will depend on the court’s assessment of the evidence and arguments presented by both Fields and the warden’s legal representatives. The ruling may potentially lead to changes in prison policy, improved conditions for inmates, or remedies granted to Fields according to the findings. **Significance:** This case underscores the ongoing legal battles related to prisoner rights and the responsibilities of prison officials in maintaining humane conditions of confinement. Decisions in such cases can have broader implications for prison reform and the treatment of inmates across the country. **Note:** Additional details such as specific claims, court findings, and rulings would be necessary to elaborate further on this case summary.

Stevie Lamar Fields v. Jeanne Woodford, Warden.


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available