Legal Case Summary

Stone v. Acting Secretary


Date Argued: Fri Nov 21 2014
Case Number: M2014-00349-CCA-R3-CD
Docket Number: 2607790
Judges:Not available
Duration: 41 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Stone v. Acting Secretary** **Docket Number:** 2607790 **Court:** [Please specify the court, e.g., U.S. District Court, Court of Appeals, etc.] **Filing Date:** [Please provide the filing date if available] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Stone (full name not specified) - **Defendant:** Acting Secretary [Full Name, Title, Department/Agency] **Background:** The case of Stone v. Acting Secretary involves [briefly describe the context of the case, e.g., "a dispute regarding administrative decisions made by the Secretary related to social security benefits. The plaintiff argues that the Acting Secretary's decision was arbitrary and capricious or contrary to the law." Include any relevant initial actions that led to the case, such as a denial of benefits, a regulatory decision, etc.]. **Legal Issues:** The primary issues in this case include: 1. Whether the Acting Secretary's decision complied with statutory and regulatory standards. 2. Whether there were any violations of rights or due process in the decision-making process. 3. The evidence supporting the plaintiff's claim against the Acting Secretary’s determination. **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff's Argument:** Stone argues that [detail the main arguments presented by the plaintiff, including any relevant legal precedents, statutory interpretations, and factual assertions supporting the claim]. - **Defendant's Argument:** The Acting Secretary contends that [summarize the key points made by the defense, including any defenses raised, statutory justifications, or counterarguments]. **Court's Findings:** The court [provide the outcome of the court's decision, such as whether the court ruled in favor of Stone or the Acting Secretary, and any significant reasoning behind the decision]. **Conclusion:** This case highlights [briefly describe the implications of the decision, such as its impact on administrative law, the applicable agency's policies, or broader societal implications]. The ruling from this case could set precedence for future administrative reviews or similar disputes involving the Secretary's determinations. **Judge:** [Name of the presiding judge, if applicable] **Date of Ruling:** [Final ruling date, if available] **Next Steps:** [If applicable, mention any potential appeals, further actions by the parties, or ongoing legal implications.] --- Please adjust any sections where specific information is missing or incomplete based on the details of the actual case.

Stone v. Acting Secretary


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available