Case Summary
**Case Summary: StoneEagle Services, Inc. v. Gillma (Docket Number: 2601994)**
**Court:** [Insert Court Name]
**Date:** [Insert Date of Decision]
**Judge:** [Insert Judge Name]
**Background:**
StoneEagle Services, Inc., a provider of software solutions for the insurance industry, filed a lawsuit against Gillma, alleging breach of contract and seeking damages. The plaintiff claimed that Gillma, who was previously engaged in a business relationship with StoneEagle, failed to fulfill the obligations as outlined in their contract, which included specific deliverables and timelines for software implementation.
**Facts:**
1. StoneEagle entered into a contractual agreement with Gillma, which outlined the responsibilities of both parties regarding the development and implementation of certain software solutions.
2. According to StoneEagle, Gillma did not meet the agreed-upon deadlines and failed to deliver critical components of the software, which hindered StoneEagle's operations and resulted in financial losses.
3. Gillma argued that delays were due to external circumstances and that they had communicated these issues to StoneEagle in a timely manner.
**Legal Issues:**
- Whether Gillma breached the terms of the contract with StoneEagle.
- The extent of damages, if any, suffered by StoneEagle as a result of Gillma's alleged breaches.
- The applicability of any defenses raised by Gillma, including claims of force majeure or other justifications for the delays.
**Ruling:**
The court found in favor of StoneEagle, determining that Gillma did breach the contract by failing to provide the necessary deliverables within the agreed timeline. The court held that Gillma did not adequately demonstrate valid reasons for the delays and that their actions directly resulted in financial harm to StoneEagle.
**Damages Awarded:**
The court awarded StoneEagle compensatory damages reflecting the financial losses incurred as a result of Gillma’s non-performance, as well as potential consequential damages linked to the impact on their business operations.
**Conclusion:**
This case underscores the importance of adhering to contract terms and serves as a reminder to businesses to maintain clear communication and documentation regarding performance obligations. The ruling also highlights the potential consequences of contractual breaches and the legal avenues available for aggrieved parties seeking restitution.
**Note:** For the latest and most accurate information, please refer to official court documents and records.