Legal Case Summary

Sum v. Holder


Date Argued: Fri Mar 12 2010
Case Number: 05-75776
Docket Number: 7847883
Judges:Wallace, Graber, McKeown
Duration: 16 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Sum v. Holder** **Docket Number:** 7847883 **Court:** [Specify the court, e.g., United States Court of Appeals, etc.] **Date:** [Insert date of decision] **Parties Involved:** - **Petitioner:** Sum - **Respondent:** Eric Holder, Attorney General of the United States **Background:** The case of Sum v. Holder involves a legal challenge brought by the petitioner, Sum, against the actions or decisions made by then-Attorney General Eric Holder. The details of the case stem from [insert relevant background information about the petitioner's situation, such as immigration status, criminal charges, or any government action in question]. **Issues Presented:** The primary legal issues in this case include: 1. [Specify the legal questions, such as constitutional rights, statutory interpretations, or administrative procedures.] 2. [Any additional issues relevant to the case.] **Arguments:** - **Petitioner’s Argument:** Sum argues that [summarize the key points of the petitioner's argument, including any constitutional claims, statutory interpretations, or factual assertions made]. - **Respondent’s Argument:** In opposition, Holder contends that [summarize the government’s position and any statutes or policies they reference]. **Decision:** The court rendered its decision on [insert date], ultimately ruling [summarize the court’s ruling, including whether the petitioner’s claims were upheld or denied, and any significant legal principles established or applied in the decision]. **Legal Reasoning:** The court provided its reasoning based on [include key rationales the court provided for its decision, including relevant laws, precedents, and judicial interpretations]. **Conclusion:** The case of Sum v. Holder underscores [discuss any broader implications of the case, such as its impact on immigration law, administrative procedures, or individual rights]. The ruling may set a precedent for subsequent cases involving similar issues. **Notes:** - [Mention any concurring or dissenting opinions if applicable] - [Highlight any immediate effects of the decision, such as potential appeals, changes in law, or subsequent legal interpretations]. --- **[Disclaimer: This summary is a fictional representation based on the docket number provided and does not reflect any real case or legal proceedings. Please refer to actual legal documents or consult legal professionals for accurate legal information.]**

Sum v. Holder


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available