Legal Case Summary

Supinski v. United Parcel Service Inc


Date Argued: Thu Jan 13 2011
Case Number: B255038
Docket Number: 2605820
Judges:Not available
Duration: 30 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Supinski v. United Parcel Service, Inc.** **Docket Number:** 2605820 **Court:** [Specific Court Name, e.g., U.S. District Court, [District]] **Date:** [Date of Decision] **Background:** In the case of Supinski v. United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS), the plaintiff, [Plaintiff's First Name] Supinski, filed a lawsuit against UPS alleging [insert details about the claims, e.g., wrongful termination, employment discrimination, violation of labor laws, etc.]. The core of the plaintiff's argument was based on [briefly outline the reasons behind the lawsuit, such as breach of contract, retaliatory actions, or workplace violations]. **Facts of the Case:** - [Date of Employment Commencement]: Supinski began employment with UPS on [start date]. - [Incident/Dispute Details]: The dispute arose from [describe the specific incident or issue, such as a workplace accident, a refusal to provide reasonable accommodations, failure to pay wages, etc.]. - [Documentation and Actions]: Supinski documented the incident and filed complaints with [mention any relevant internal or external bodies, like HR, EEOC, etc.]. **Legal Issues:** The primary legal issues at stake included: 1. [Describe legal issue #1, e.g., whether UPS violated federal or state employment laws]. 2. [Describe legal issue #2, e.g., whether there was sufficient evidence to support claims of discrimination or retaliation]. **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff's Arguments:** Supinski contended that UPS [summarize the arguments made by Supinski, such as a failure to accommodate, discriminatory practices, etc.]. - **Defendant's Arguments:** UPS defended itself by stating that [summarize UPS's defense, such as adherence to company policies, lack of evidence for the claims, etc.]. **Court's Findings:** After reviewing the submissions from both parties, the court found that [summarize the key findings of the court, including any determinations on liability, damages, or dismissals]. The judge concluded that [insert the court's decision, e.g., in favor of the plaintiff/defendant, specifics of any verdict, etc.]. **Outcome:** The court ruled in [favor of Supinski/favor of UPS], leading to [specify the outcome, like awarding damages, reinstatement, or dismissal of the case]. Both parties were granted [mention if there were any opportunities for appeal or further actions]. **Significance:** This case is significant because it [explain the broader implications, such as affirming certain rights, clarifying employment law, or influencing future cases regarding workplace disputes]. **Conclusion:** The decision in Supinski v. UPS sets a precedent for similar cases involving [mention relevant aspects of employment law or workplace rights]. It underscores the importance of [mention any pertinent themes, such as employee rights, company liability, etc.]. **[Note: Please fill in the placeholders with relevant details that apply to the specific case or jurisdiction.]**

Supinski v. United Parcel Service Inc


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available