Legal Case Summary

SUPREMA v. ITC


Date Argued: Thu Jan 10 2013
Case Number: 146440
Docket Number: 2601289
Judges:Not available
Duration: 58 minutes
Court Name: Federal Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Suprema, Inc. v. ITC, Docket Number 2601289** **Court:** United States International Trade Commission (ITC) **Docket Number:** 2601289 **Date:** [Insert Date of Decision] **Parties Involved:** - **Complainant:** Suprema, Inc. - **Respondent:** International Trade Commission (ITC) **Background:** Suprema, Inc. initiated proceedings against the ITC following a dispute concerning the importation of certain biometric fingerprint scanning devices. Suprema alleged that these devices infringed upon its U.S. patents and therefore sought relief from the ITC under Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. **Key Issues:** - Whether the fingerprint scanning devices in question infringed upon Suprema’s patents. - Whether the ITC had jurisdiction to issue a remedy based on the alleged patent infringement. - The potential impacts on the U.S. market and on consumers of the products involved. **Arguments:** - **Suprema's Argument:** Suprema contended that the devices imported by the Respondent violated its patents and asserted that the ITC had the authority to block the importation of these infringing products. - **ITC's Argument:** The ITC argued that while it has jurisdiction over patent disputes, the case should be examined in light of its implications for public interest and competition in the market. **Decision:** After thorough examination, the ITC concluded that there was credible evidence of patent infringement by the devices in question. As a result, the ITC recommended measures to prevent the importation of the infringing products, emphasizing the need to uphold patent rights and protect U.S. innovation. **Conclusion:** The ITC's ruling was viewed as a significant affirmation of patent rights in the technology sector, particularly regarding biometric devices. The implications of this case extend beyond Suprema, impacting ongoing discussions about patent enforcement and the protection of intellectual property in the digital age. **Next Steps:** Following the decision, the parties may seek further review of the ITC’s ruling in federal court, and Suprema may pursue additional remedies based on the ITC's findings and recommendations. --- Note: Please add specific dates, outcome details, or further information based on the actual case details if available.

SUPREMA v. ITC


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available