Legal Case Summary

Surinderjit Brar v. Thrifty Payless Inc


Date Argued: Mon Dec 05 2011
Case Number: 10-35715
Docket Number: 7840029
Judges:Tashima, McKeown, Tallman
Duration: 33 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Surinderjit Brar v. Thrifty Payless Inc.** **Docket Number:** 7840029 **Court:** [Specify the Court Name, e.g., Superior Court or specific jurisdiction if known] **Date:** [Specify the Date of the ruling or filing] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Surinderjit Brar - **Defendant:** Thrifty Payless Inc. **Background:** Surinderjit Brar filed a lawsuit against Thrifty Payless Inc., alleging [provide concise details about the nature of the claim, e.g., injury sustained on the premises, employment dispute, breach of contract, etc.]. The incident leading to the lawsuit occurred on [insert date of the incident if known] at a location operated by Thrifty Payless Inc. **Claims:** Brar's claims against Thrifty Payless Inc. included [list specific claims, such as negligence, premises liability, wrongful termination, etc.]. Brar alleged that [summarize the plaintiff's main arguments and grievances, outlining the injuries or damages sought]. **Defendant's Response:** Thrifty Payless Inc. responded by [briefly describe the defense's position, such as denying the allegations, asserting affirmative defenses, or claiming contributory negligence by Brar]. The defendant argued that [summarize any key points or arguments made by the defendant]. **Legal Issues:** The case presented several legal issues, including: - [List key legal issues, such as liability, damages, jurisdictional questions, etc.] **Court's Findings:** After reviewing the evidence and arguments from both parties, the court [summarize the court's findings or rulings, including whether the case was dismissed, if summary judgment was granted, or if it went to trial]. **Outcome:** The court ruled in favor of [indicate which party won the case, if applicable, and the outcome such as monetary compensation awarded, injunctions, or other remedies granted]. **Conclusion:** The ruling in Surinderjit Brar v. Thrifty Payless Inc. highlights [provide insights into the broader implications of the case, such as precedent, impact on future cases, or legal interpretations]. The case is significant due to [explain any interesting aspects of the case that could be relevant for public knowledge or law practice]. --- *Note: This summary is a fictional example. For accurate details on docket number 7840029, please refer to the appropriate legal databases or court records.*

Surinderjit Brar v. Thrifty Payless Inc


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available