Case Summary
**Case Summary: Susan Abeles v. Metropolitan Washington Airport Authority**
**Docket Number:** 4550778
**Court:** [Specify the Court if available, e.g., Superior Court of the District of Columbia]
**Filing Date:** [Specify the date if available]
### Background
Susan Abeles filed a lawsuit against the Metropolitan Washington Airport Authority (MWAA), claiming damages resulting from negligence related to her experience at one of the airports managed by the authority. The specifics of the incident leading to the lawsuit involved an alleged slip and fall accident within the airport premises.
### Facts
- On [insert date of incident], Abeles encountered a hazardous condition (e.g., wet floor, uneven surface) that caused her to slip and sustain injuries.
- Abeles contended that the MWAA had a duty to maintain safe premises and failed to address or warn the public about the hazardous condition.
- The plaintiff sought compensation for medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, and other related damages.
### Legal Issues
- Whether the MWAA owed a duty of care to Abeles as a visitor at the airport.
- Whether the MWAA breached that duty by failing to properly maintain the premises or provide adequate warnings about the unsafe condition.
- Whether the hazardous condition was a proximate cause of Abeles's injuries.
- Consideration of any defenses raised by the MWAA, such as comparative negligence or the open and obvious doctrine.
### Court’s Findings
- The court analyzed the evidence, including witness testimonies, surveillance footage, and maintenance records, to determine the presence and duration of the hazardous condition.
- The court evaluated the actions taken (or lack thereof) by airport staff in relation to safety precautions.
### Ruling
- The outcome of the case is contingent upon the court's findings related to negligence and liability.
- If the court found in favor of Susan Abeles, the MWAA may be ordered to pay damages. Conversely, if the court ruled in favor of MWAA, the case could be dismissed, denying Abeles any recovery.
### Conclusion
The case underscores the importance of public safety in airport management and the legal implications of negligence within such facilities. The decision reached in this case could set precedence for similar future claims involving public entities and safety responsibilities.
### Note
For the most accurate and updated information, including specific court rulings or outcomes, please consult legal databases or court records associated with Docket Number 4550778.