Case Summary
**Case Summary: Susan Kobold v. Good Samaritan Regional Medical Center**
**Docket Number:** 3010891
**Court:** [Specify Court Name, e.g., Circuit Court, Appeals Court]
**Date:** [Specify date of ruling or filing]
**Parties Involved:**
- **Plaintiff:** Susan Kobold
- **Defendant:** Good Samaritan Regional Medical Center
**Background:**
Susan Kobold filed a lawsuit against Good Samaritan Regional Medical Center, alleging [briefly state the main issues, e.g., medical negligence, failure to provide appropriate care, breach of duty]. The case arises from events that took place on [specific date or time frame], where the plaintiff claims that adequate standards of care were not met by the medical facility or its staff.
**Facts:**
- Susan Kobold received treatment at Good Samaritan Regional Medical Center.
- [Provide a concise overview of the specific events leading to the lawsuit, including any treatments, procedures, or failures that are relevant.]
- The plaintiff asserts that [include details about the alleged negligence, injuries sustained, or other pertinent information].
**Legal Issues:**
The central legal questions in this case revolve around:
1. Whether Good Samaritan Regional Medical Center and its staff met the accepted standard of care in treating Susan Kobold.
2. The determination of causation relating to the alleged injuries and damages claimed by the plaintiff.
3. Any defenses presented by the defendant that may absolve them of liability.
**Arguments:**
- **Plaintiff's Argument:** Susan Kobold claims that the medical center failed to provide appropriate and timely care that led to [specific injuries or damages]. The plaintiff's evidence includes [mention types of evidence, such as expert testimonies, medical records, etc.].
- **Defendant's Argument:** Good Samaritan Regional Medical Center contends that they acted within the necessary standard of care and that any adverse outcomes were a result of non-negligent factors. They may argue [mention any specific defenses, e.g., assumption of risk, pre-existing conditions, etc.].
**Outcome:**
[Describe the outcome of the case, whether it resulted in a trial verdict, settlement, dismissal, or appeals outcome. Include damages awarded, if applicable.]
**Conclusion:**
The case of Susan Kobold v. Good Samaritan Regional Medical Center highlights critical issues surrounding medical negligence and the standards of care expected from healthcare providers. The resolution of this case emphasizes the legal responsibilities of medical institutions and the rights of patients seeking recourse for perceived medical failures.
**Note:** This summary is a hypothetical representation based on the requested case and does not reflect real events or rulings. For exact details, it is essential to refer to the actual court documents and opinions pertaining to the case.